Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Frank Martin Believes He KO's Vasiliy Lomachenko

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Not a chance. Loma is too elusive.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Noelanthony View Post

      Everyone in boxing can think what they want he didn’t get his hands raised and he went back to Ukraine with just his Gucci belt , sore ribs and bruises on his face. Maybe he can accept the idea that if he fought the 12th like 99% of boxers would he may have pulled it off. That’s why he had snot in his nose crying his eyes out back stage.
      This funny to read coming from a little ****** who has never stepped in the ring.
      El_Mero El_Mero likes this.

      Comment


      • #33
        Loma is not good enough to beat frank martin.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Lomadeaux View Post

          This funny to read coming from a little ****** who has never stepped in the ring.
          Who told you that Lomasexual? Are you still around all the fellas laughing at the posts on boxingscene.

          i can’t believe you actually said that you degenerate

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Noelanthony View Post

            Who told you that Lomasexual? Are you still around all the fellas laughing at the posts on boxingscene.

            i can’t believe you actually said that you degenerate
            Yea coming on here and seeing posts by little ******s like yourself is just comical. You ***** boys take wasting life to another level. Get to the gym soy boy.
            El_Mero El_Mero likes this.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Lomadeaux View Post

              Yea coming on here and seeing posts by little ******s like yourself is just comical. You ***** boys take wasting life to another level. Get to the gym soy boy.
              Showing off because you are a cleaner at your local gym?you go girl

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Lomadeaux View Post
                Why would Loma accept the idea that he lost when nearly everybody in boxing thinks he won?
                If you're worried about the judges - than don't make it close. A loss is a loss. Fact is, Lomanchenko is a superb fighter, but not HOF level, they way they used to advertise him to be. That's why you never jump the gun. See Ronny Harris, Tony Ayala, James Shuler, Michael Olijide, Popo Fritas, Jermain Taylor....etc. All terrific fighters, but Yaaaaaaaa.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Willow The Wisp View Post

                  If you're worried about the judges - than don't make it close. A loss is a loss. Fact is, Lomanchenko is a superb fighter, but not HOF level, they way they used to advertise him to be. That's why you never jump the gun. See Ronny Harris, Tony Ayala, James Shuler, Michael Olijide, Popo Fritas, Jermain Taylor....etc. All terrific fighters, but Yaaaaaaaa.
                  Don't say silly things. Undisputed, my dude. We have a major issue with the sports judging. The only way to fix the sport is the only way to ever fix the sport, with a federal commission. I still hold out hope that one day that may still happen.
                  El_Mero El_Mero likes this.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Lomadeaux View Post

                    Don't say silly things. Undisputed, my dude. We have a major issue with the sports judging. The only way to fix the sport is the only way to ever fix the sport, with a federal commission. I still hold out hope that one day that may still happen.
                    ...Especially an issue when your favorite fighter gets nicked in a close one. I get it.
                    If you knew me, you'd know with a little light research how diligently I campaigned to make that type of accountability happen for Boxing. Judging is merely the tip of the iceberg. Promoter-Client contracts, health insurance, pension contribution, ratings, eliminating sanctioning bodies, cenergy in support of the sport without monopoly....so many issues.
                    The statutes of The Professional Boxing Safety Act of 1996, House of Representatives 4167 and 114 Stat. 321(3)(2000)) were among the successes resulting from our effots, and they have made a powerful net positive difference.
                    But the work is hardly done.

                    "Bring in the feds" was our team's slogan.
                    Without digress, there are challenges that you may be aware of, or maybe not.
                    Quickly, two of those related to boxing being an international business that exists in 177 of the 195 sovereign nation on earth.
                    When we speak of Feds, we have to consider "who's feds".

                    The other is the basic truth of judging a fight. A punch stat number is not nearly enough. Are you a licenced judge? Even those charged with training judges struggle a bit to effectively articulate the concept of "Ring Generalship". Sometimes, a round or even a fight, comes down ascetics, like judging Olympic diving (though infinitely more complex). I'm not convinced that we can ever fix that. Sometimes the better fighter is literally in the eye of the beholder.

                    If I have over answered you statement, oh, well. Enjoy.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP