Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Naseem Hamed on Fury-Ngannou: I Think It's a Great Business Move

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Comments Thread For: Naseem Hamed on Fury-Ngannou: I Think It's a Great Business Move

    Hall of Famer Prince Naseem Hamed has no problem with Tyson Fury's decision to fight former UFC heavyweight champion Francis Ngannou. Earlier this week, it was officially announced that a deal was finalized for Fury to take part in a cross-sport boxing match against Ngannou on October 28th in Saudi Arabia.
    [Click Here To Read More]

  • #2
    Hamed needs to be on the mic more, his post fight with Duke McKensie after Eubank Groves will never not be funny
    a5pe4 a5pe4 likes this.

    Comment


    • #3
      Now you a loser too , Hamed
      Then again your opinion don’t mean chit

      Comment


      • #4
        He should fight for the title if he wins what a laugh
        Knuckle sandwich Knuckle sandwich likes this.

        Comment


        • #5
          Hamed is the epitomey of a chav

          Comment


          • #6
            Wow Hamed what a stretch what a deep insight into a fight card ---- "good business move" hookers make good business moves too maybe we should all save our PPV dollars and spend it on hookers ? Ummm watch a lousy phony so called fight or buy some hookers ? Wonder what Hamed thinks ? He should know because he is prostituting himself for Fury now...............

            Comment


            • #7
              Let's be honest, he's not wrong. Fury's gonna make a bunch of money for fighting somebody who doesn't belong in the ring with him.

              If promoter's know they can get paid serving up dross then who's fault is it? The people buying it...

              Fury can fk off though next time he says "I'm a fighting man, not like AJ who's all business". They're the same, all about the money.

              Comment


              • #8
                All the clowns crying obviously didn’t read beyond the headline. He said it’s a good business move but doesn’t mean anything because he’s not fighting a boxer and just wants to see him fight Usyk.

                Pretty accurate I think.
                Monty Fisto Monty Fisto likes this.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by 786 View Post
                  All the clowns crying obviously didn’t read beyond the headline. He said it’s a good business move but doesn’t mean anything because he’s not fighting a boxer and just wants to see him fight Usyk.

                  Pretty accurate I think.
                  Why are they clowns and why is it accurate? Please explain.
                  This isn't conor mcgregor, this guy's name isn't well known at all and definitely most ufc fans probably can't spell it. The UFC heavyweight division has never been popular, the most famous heavyweight ever is brock lesnar and that's because of wwe.

                  So I don't think it's a good business move at all, I think it's quick cash that will do his career damage not just because it's an easy fight but because I think it will flop relatively speaking and will actually devalue fury for the next Saudi fight

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Great business decision for them, bad fight in terms of any competitiveness.

                    Going way off topic, if you inspect certain fighters unbeaten records, let's say great fighters, you can point out a fight they could've lost.

                    For Fury, I think it was the first fight with a guy named McDermott. Mayweather, first Castillo fight. Calzaghe, debatable ones with Robin Reid and Hopkins.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP