Comments Thread For: Terence Crawford: "I've Been The Underdog My Whole Career"

[Boston Herald]

Crawford is going to knock Spence out. Crawford is smart. Spence is dumb. Easy outcome

[archiemoore1]

I'm looking at all the ignorant mfers trying to take what he said literally. When he talks about being the underdog, he's not referring to Vegas. He's referring to the nay sayers claiming he is too small, not experienced enough, he's chinny, "hasn't fought no body", isn't a true welterweight, fought the shell of ..........., etc...... All the ******ity and excuses to belittle every accomplishment and/or milestone he has or is trying to accomplish..... This is the nonsense he continues to hear. That is what he is referring to as the "underdog"...... If mfers had common sense or even just listened to the actual interview and have a comprehension at the appropriate level to consider themselves an adult, you would clearly understand that he is not a betting man, thus he isn't referring to Vegas predictions.

Going into this fight, mfers are trying to repeat the silliness of Derrick James and Errol Spence Jr, chanting "who has he fought"?...........Well, if that's the case then why is it that Vegas has Spence as the slight underdog. I would think that those individuals are more connected with those directly associated with the sport so that they can maximize their profit off the betting game......meanwhile ignorant mfers on social media try to push and agenda that Spence is the more proven champion because he beat "a better version" of Porter and Brook.

Crawford, even though he had a decent amateur career, didn't come in on a red carpet like some of his peers who went through the Olympic circuit. Every accolade he has, he's earned. He's not a paper champ. HIs 6 world titles came off the hands of other champions and many of them were undefeated going into the fight.

Even today with all he's done in the sport.....his greatness is still questioned. Especially if we are comparing him to a certain welterweight on holds 3 belts in the division to his 1.

I was thinking the same exact thing u wrote, so i don't have to say sh.t. Critics will be critics

[Boricua181]

No you haven't, so stop bull****ting, the boxing fans aren't buying your latest story line.

[Boricua181]

No you havnt

Exactly!

[Silence]

You gotta be underdog against any ATG/HoF but you're cherrypicking too much that you're always favour on odds.

Even against Spence. Don't talk nonsense you moron.

[Willy Wanker]

Pretty sure every opponent Crawford had was the underdog.

[$quabbles94806]

I would like to know when Crawford was the underdog of a fight? Even in this fight some betting sites have him as the favorite.

When he fought Gamboa, and Ricky Burns.

[Smash]

When he fought Gamboa, and Ricky Burns.

the latest odds on all of the big fights with a Burns win being listed at +250 and a Crawford victory at -300, thats what i found on a quick internet search for crawford burns so im not sure if burns was the fav here

and internet also saying crawford fav v gamboa lol

[Smash]

Crawford is sort of talking teo kinda gibberish now, how the hell is a guy whos at the top or close to top of p4p lists the under dog against other guys who are lower on that list or not even on those lists at all lol

[Smash]

is bud the under dog in his court case v arum i wonder, arum is no saint but i think bud is difficult to deal with too, arum says he lost money on every crawford fight, bud says hes owed money by arum, its a funny sport boxing at times