Comments Thread For: Terence Crawford: "I've Been The Underdog My Whole Career"

[LAchargers373]

He was the underdog against Prescott when he came in as a late replacement. No one knew who he was really. Only time in his entire career he was ever an underdog

[Dean_Razorback]

lol. no were not, wtf is he talking about?

[Str8.2.Da.Point]

I'm looking at all the ignorant mfers trying to take what he said literally. When he talks about being the underdog, he's not referring to Vegas. He's referring to the nay sayers claiming he is too small, not experienced enough, he's chinny, "hasn't fought no body", isn't a true welterweight, fought the shell of ..........., etc...... All the ******ity and excuses to belittle every accomplishment and/or milestone he has or is trying to accomplish..... This is the nonsense he continues to hear. That is what he is referring to as the "underdog"...... If mfers had common sense or even just listened to the actual interview and have a comprehension at the appropriate level to consider themselves an adult, you would clearly understand that he is not a betting man, thus he isn't referring to Vegas predictions.

Going into this fight, mfers are trying to repeat the silliness of Derrick James and Errol Spence Jr, chanting "who has he fought"?...........Well, if that's the case then why is it that Vegas has Spence as the slight underdog. I would think that those individuals are more connected with those directly associated with the sport so that they can maximize their profit off the betting game......meanwhile ignorant mfers on social media try to push and agenda that Spence is the more proven champion because he beat "a better version" of Porter and Brook.

Crawford, even though he had a decent amateur career, didn't come in on a red carpet like some of his peers who went through the Olympic circuit. Every accolade he has, he's earned. He's not a paper champ. HIs 6 world titles came off the hands of other champions and many of them were undefeated going into the fight.

Even today with all he's done in the sport.....his greatness is still questioned. Especially if we are comparing him to a certain welterweight on holds 3 belts in the division to his 1.

[Greenfield02]

When has this dude been the underdog? All his fights he has been the betting favorite because of the lack of quality opponents. I think those 5g towers really did a number on this guy.....

[tkoboxingscene]

Sure, you were a real underdog vs Ndongo... FOH

[LAchargers373]

I'm looking at all the ignorant mfers trying to take what he said literally. When he talks about being the underdog, he's not referring to Vegas. He's referring to the nay sayers claiming he is too small, not experienced enough, he's chinny, "hasn't fought no body", isn't a true welterweight, fought the shell of ..........., etc...... All the ******ity and excuses to belittle every accomplishment and/or milestone he has or is trying to accomplish..... This is the nonsense he continues to hear. That is what he is referring to as the "underdog"...... If mfers had common sense or even just listened to the actual interview and have a comprehension at the appropriate level to consider themselves an adult, you would clearly understand that he is not a betting man, thus he isn't referring to Vegas predictions.

Going into this fight, mfers are trying to repeat the silliness of Derrick James and Errol Spence Jr, chanting "who has he fought"?...........Well, if that's the case then why is it that Vegas has Spence as the slight underdog. I would think that those individuals are more connected with those directly associated with the sport so that they can maximize their profit off the betting game......meanwhile ignorant mfers on social media try to push and agenda that Spence is the more proven champion because he beat "a better version" of Porter and Brook.

Crawford, even though he had a decent amateur career, didn't come in on a red carpet like some of his peers who went through the Olympic circuit. Every accolade he has, he's earned. He's not a paper champ. HIs 6 world titles came off the hands of other champions and many of them were undefeated going into the fight.

Even today with all he's done in the sport.....his greatness is still questioned. Especially if we are comparing him to a certain welterweight on holds 3 belts in the division to his 1.

Bud has talent bud he’s not as good as u think. He has not achieved greatness. Beating joe horn Julius ondongol and Bobby burns doesn’t make u an elite champion. He was under the same promotional umbrella as DSG mikey garcia and manny pacquaio Josh Taylor and prograis while they were in their primes and not one of these fights were made. Not one. He claimed to be the best in the division because he beat indigol and Booby burns aHis best win is a retirement fight Shawn porter who didn’t really train and was even with him till he got knocked out. Bud has talent he makes in ring adjustments and is one of the top ring IQs I’ve seen. Spence’s is better tho. And he’s proved it against better competition. Ugas would beat crawford and anyone who has seen them fight knows this. Don’t believe me? Go waa Their amatuer fights. They weren’t competitive bud got destroyed. He also went 1-1 in the amateurs against DSG which is why he wouldn’t fight him when they were both 140 and at top rank. It’s just laughable at this point anyone defending his resume

[LAchargers373]

Greatness is pacquaio dead eating HOFamer after HOFamer on his way to the top. Bud crawford is FAR from anything that resembles that

[Monty Fisto]

I'm looking at all the ignorant mfers trying to take what he said literally. When he talks about being the underdog, he's not referring to Vegas. He's referring to the nay sayers claiming he is too small, not experienced enough, he's chinny, "hasn't fought no body", isn't a true welterweight, fought the shell of ..........., etc...... All the ******ity and excuses to belittle every accomplishment and/or milestone he has or is trying to accomplish..... This is the nonsense he continues to hear. That is what he is referring to as the "underdog"...... If mfers had common sense or even just listened to the actual interview and have a comprehension at the appropriate level to consider themselves an adult, you would clearly understand that he is not a betting man, thus he isn't referring to Vegas predictions.

Going into this fight, mfers are trying to repeat the silliness of Derrick James and Errol Spence Jr, chanting "who has he fought"?...........Well, if that's the case then why is it that Vegas has Spence as the slight underdog. I would think that those individuals are more connected with those directly associated with the sport so that they can maximize their profit off the betting game......meanwhile ignorant mfers on social media try to push and agenda that Spence is the more proven champion because he beat "a better version" of Porter and Brook.

Crawford, even though he had a decent amateur career, didn't come in on a red carpet like some of his peers who went through the Olympic circuit. Every accolade he has, he's earned. He's not a paper champ. HIs 6 world titles came off the hands of other champions and many of them were undefeated going into the fight.

Even today with all he's done in the sport.....his greatness is still questioned. Especially if we are comparing him to a certain welterweight on holds 3 belts in the division to his 1.

Thanks for explaining why when he called himself the underdog he didn't mean underdog but something completely different.

How ****** for people to have thought when he said underdog, that he meant underdog.

Let's be clear: an underdog means a person or team that is expected to lose.

Crawford said he has been the undergod his whole career. He explains what he means by underdog in this fight, by saying he is being written off, that people are saying Errol is bigger, stronger, more technical, has a better jab, is more defensive. In other words, he is using the meaning of underdog we all understand ("we" meaning everyone but you) -- he is saying everyone expects him to lose.

And it is complete bollocks.

[gooderz84]

not according to bet365

[TMLT87]

Lol hes been a major favourite in almost every fight hes ever been in.