Comments Thread For: Derrick James Not Concerned With Terence's Power: 'Who The F--- Has Crawford Fought?'

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wrecksracer
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 3702
    • 2,690
    • 2,557
    • 28,783

    #71
    Originally posted by Oregonian
    ———
    Once again, you are the one saying it. I guess you are smarter than me
    you are diminishing your own fighter's achievement. Yes, I am smarter than you.

    Comment

    • wrecksracer
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jun 2008
      • 3702
      • 2,690
      • 2,557
      • 28,783

      #72
      Originally posted by Oregonian
      ———-
      Not making 147 is a fair point. It does take a toll on the body.
      As for comparison of results, if both guys beat Porter, what does it matter?
      I used your own logic to say Khan KO’d Zab and Floyd couldn’t, does that make Khan’s win better? Or is Khan better than Floyd?
      you said triangle theory, and I wasn't using the triangle theory. End of story. You can't defend your point. Where exactly did I say that because Crawford beat Porter easier, he would beat Spence?

      Comment

      • Roadblock
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • May 2006
        • 14031
        • 3,535
        • 428
        • 108,713

        #73
        Originally posted by Basco
        I have a feeling this is going to be a dissapointing fight with both scared to commint. A chess match all the way. Boring desicion fight incoming.
        It may start like that but sitting back in not in their DNA.

        Comment

        • IronDanHamza
          BoxingScene Icon
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2009
          • 48371
          • 4,778
          • 266
          • 104,043

          #74
          Originally posted by Roadblock

          Well it can be true, belts don't mean they came from great fighters, look at Haney and Kambosis, George is average. This era has been quite weak across the board.

          I think Errol taking TCs power is the key to them winning, if he can he will beat TC if he cant its goodnight Irene
          Can you think of an example of a fighter who's a 3 weight world champion, 2 of which Lineal and one of which undisputed that also fought no one of note?

          Comment

          • Oregonian
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jun 2019
            • 6445
            • 1,982
            • 1,725
            • 36,066

            #75
            Originally posted by wrecksracer

            you are diminishing your own fighter's achievement. Yes, I am smarter than you.
            ——-
            I’m not the only one saying you are using the triangle theory but good luck arguing with everyone so hard trying to prove you are smarter than all.

            Comment

            • Oregonian
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jun 2019
              • 6445
              • 1,982
              • 1,725
              • 36,066

              #76
              Originally posted by wrecksracer

              you said triangle theory, and I wasn't using the triangle theory. End of story. You can't defend your point. Where exactly did I say that because Crawford beat Porter easier, he would beat Spence?
              ——-
              You are smarter than all of us so you win.

              Comment

              • Roadblock
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • May 2006
                • 14031
                • 3,535
                • 428
                • 108,713

                #77
                Originally posted by IronDanHamza

                Can you think of an example of a fighter who's a 3 weight world champion, 2 of which Lineal and one of which undisputed that also fought no one of note?
                First you got to find the weak guys that got it in the first place to take it from, and there is a sht load of average guys that won world titles, and a top liner like TC would go through them like a dose of salts which is what happened, I mean somebody said Horn and Postol were his best wins, I think TC resume is quite weak, Errols is not much better, not their fault just the era is early and not very strong, it was like Kambosis being undisputed that's a joke in my eyes.

                Comment

                • IronDanHamza
                  BoxingScene Icon
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 48371
                  • 4,778
                  • 266
                  • 104,043

                  #78
                  Originally posted by Roadblock

                  First you got to find the weak guys that got it in the first place to take it from, and there is a sht load of average guys that won world titles, and a top liner like TC would go through them like a dose of salts which is what happened, I mean somebody said Horn and Postol were his best wins, I think TC resume is quite weak, Errols is not much better, not their fault just the era is early and not very strong, it was like Kambosis being undisputed that's a joke in my eyes.
                  But can you think of an example though? Of a fighter who's a 3 weight world champion, 2 of which Lineal and 1 of which undisputed who's also fought no one of note?

                  Comment

                  • Roadblock
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • May 2006
                    • 14031
                    • 3,535
                    • 428
                    • 108,713

                    #79
                    Originally posted by IronDanHamza

                    But can you think of an example though? Of a fighter who's a 3 weight world champion, 2 of which Lineal and 1 of which undisputed who's also fought no one of note?
                    Not of the top of my head it's not often the stars align in such a way if ever, where there is only one elite guy and the others are ordinary across a number of divisions, generally there is stiff comp it just wasn't there during TCs run, not talking away from TC he is a great fighter just saying his belts are from low rent guys, both Errol and TC this is the highest quality fight either has been in, most greats have this in every division as they rise in weights. Its just the era is weak and hasn't matured through the melting pot just yet.

                    Comment

                    • IronDanHamza
                      BoxingScene Icon
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 48371
                      • 4,778
                      • 266
                      • 104,043

                      #80
                      Originally posted by Roadblock

                      Not of the top of my head it's not often the stars align in such a way if ever, where there is only one elite guy and the others are ordinary across a number of divisions, generally there is stiff comp it just wasn't there during TCs run, not talking away from TC he is a great fighter just saying his belts are from low rent guys, both Errol and TC this is the highest quality fight either has been in, most greats have this in every division as they rise in weights. Its just the era is weak and hasn't matured through the melting pot just yet.
                      Well there you go then, that’s why it’s a ****** argument.

                      It’s impossible to achieve the above and also have fought no one.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP