Comments Thread For: Derrick James Not Concerned With Terence's Power: 'Who The F--- Has Crawford Fought?'

[Gary Coleman]

read the title of the article again. My response was to James' comment that Crawford hasn't fought anybody. He clearly has fought somebody. He fought guy that Spence could only manage a split decision with. Did James forget that fight? It's Spence's best win. Nowhere did I say that because Crawford beat Porter, he will beat Spence. That would be the triangle theory.

Porter is not Spence's best win. Stop the bs.

Is that what you're going to hang your hat on? You beat a guy, Brook beat 9 years ago, Thurman beat 7 years ago, was dropped by Broner and dropped and beaten by Spence 2 years prior.

Have at it, boss.

[wrecksracer]

Porter is not Spence's best win. Stop the bs.

Is that what you're going to hang your hat on? You beat a guy, Brook beat 9 years ago, Thurman beat 7 years ago, was dropped by Broner and dropped and beaten by Spence 2 years prior.

Have at it, boss.

Brook with half of his faced caved in by GGG is Spence's best win? lol. So go ahead and highlight where I used the triangle theory, otherwise it is you who are dense.

[hitmanjosh]

I love it! nobody know who's going to win this dammmm fight and everyone is dying to see it that's a fan and then everyone want to act as if they know who the best is; go sit yo aSs down and STFU Most People Don't Know Sh-t About Boxing! Thanks Uncle Roger

[_Rexy_]

He said the same thing about Beterbiev before the Browne fight...

[Gary Coleman]

Brook with half of his faced caved in by GGG is Spence's best win? lol. So go ahead and highlight where I used the triangle theory, otherwise it is you who are dense.

I can admit I was wrong. The way you used the common opponent was not to suggest the triangle theory, but you are definitely wrong about Porter being Spence's best win. That's just you trying to prop up Bud's medicore resume.

Brook, yes BROOK, Ugas and coming at Danny right after the accident were all better wins.

[Combat Talk Radio]

Thanks for the shout-out. I think most fans would agree that 1.) Crawford took the questionnaire seriously and has honestly evaluated his opponent and 2.) Spence was being intentionally disingenuous about his assessment of Crawford's abilities. He's trying to be smartass about it for the cameras, but Spence is a bit too smart and experienced to rate Bud that low in any category. Neither guy is truly underestimating the other. Both know that they have bring their A-games to win.

Or maybe Spence just wanted a reaction from Porter. Would have been nice.

[wrecksracer]

I can admit I was wrong. The way you used the common opponent was not to suggest the triangle theory, but you are definitely wrong about Porter being Spence's best win. That's just you trying to prop up Bud's medicore resume.

Brook, yes BROOK, Ugas and coming at Danny right after the accident were all better wins.

That wasn't prime Brook, and it's Spence's best win? Ugas? The guy that Porter beat? Danny Garcia? Who never had a decent win at 147? I disagree with you. Only one guy held Spence to a split decision. Who was that? Good luck on fight night.

[Southpawology]

Crawford himself said ricky burns is his best win LMAO.

Oh yea, P4P GOAT level stuff right there .

Spence gonna expose this fraud.

[Cool story]

Porter is not Spence's best win. Stop the bs.

Is that what you're going to hang your hat on? You beat a guy, Brook beat 9 years ago, Thurman beat 7 years ago, was dropped by Broner and dropped and beaten by Spence 2 years prior.

Have at it, boss.

So Spence basically fighting Thurmans leftovers?
not that much different from bud fighting Spence so called leftovers

[Cool story]

Crawford himself said ricky burns is his best win LMAO.

Oh yea, P4P GOAT level stuff right there .

Spence gonna expose this fraud.

Nobody really has Spence as p4p number 1

they have Crawford as p4p for a reason