Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Devin Haney Blames Floyd Mayweather For “Messed Up” State Of The Sport

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    I've been preaching this forever, but be immediately deemed a hater because of my affiliation with Pacquiao, lol. Though the proof is in the pudding. Boxing had really amazing matchups prior to Fraud Jr's loudmouth run. He made a lot of noise, got people to buy to see him lose, snoozed out the matches, yet continued to market himself well to make people continue to buy. I think the best part about that, he's so bitter and sour that most of America still can't stand him, yet he made himself the villain to earn all that $$$.

    When I see an undefeated record, I don't see an impressive fighter. I see red flags. How can someone call themselves great, if they never took a loss to see how they would come back from it? That's a HUGE factor in mental of a fighter. So many fall apart once they take their first loss while others pick themselves up, learn from it, adapt and continue.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by ELPacman View Post
      How can someone call themselves great, if they never took a loss to see how they would come back from it?.
      The top guys in boxing have massive egos nurtured by their progress through the sport, an L on that record is a big no no, cant call yourself undefeated which is a massive buzzword now in boxing for quite a lot of them, they have no issues in calling themselves great and point to the 0 as proof

      Comment


      • #33
        vegas judges are also to blamed not just mayweatherr for giving him GIFT WINS to protect the undefeated record.
        ELPacman ELPacman likes this.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by MONGOOSE66 View Post

          Regardless of Pimples and circumstances Haney CURRENTLY owns a sheeit load of belts. You can make all kinds of excuses about why he does but that dont matter. You remind me of my wife—-mouths a flapping and not saying anything nobody doesn’t already know or care about. Stick with the facts with me otherwise you’re going to put me to sleep.
          Hey, can you get me a beer and make me a sandwich?
          The belts don't mean much if you beat an ordinary guy to get them, you seem to think the belts are the stamp, I don't fly with that in my eyes when you beat one B+ guy to get 3 belts youre not really undisputed, its strange how I mention the facts about Kambosis and Loma and you say its excuses, makes no sense to me what youre even crying about excuses for what exactly, basically Im saying Haney is not on Floyds level and is doing what he said Floyd did, there is no comparison Haney has a career to do before he is in a convo with Mayweather.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Roadblock View Post

            The belts don't mean much if you beat an ordinary guy to get them, you seem to think the belts are the stamp, I don't fly with that in my eyes when you beat one B+ guy to get 3 belts youre not really undisputed, its strange how I mention the facts about Kambosis and Loma and you say its excuses, makes no sense to me what youre even crying about excuses for what exactly, basically Im saying Haney is not on Floyds level and is doing what he said Floyd did, there is no comparison Haney has a career to do before he is in a convo with Mayweather.
            Hmmm, no sheeit but you and I both know you can’t get into the hall of fame without belts. Sooooo

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Roadblock View Post

              What losing a bunch of fights against ordinary guys as the blueprint to greatness lol, explain to me what defines greatness, Floyd beat Manny in so many areas while they shared the same era wtf you on about other than favouritism, man you just sing the same no logic BS daily.

              Read this slowly, Floyd's resume is the most decorated in his era no other fighter in his era comes close to him and that's the logical core of the whole debate, oh he was protecting his 0 is the biggest crock of fan hater horse sht there is, how the fck do you have the best resume of your era stay undefeated for 20 yrs jump 4 weight classes while beating more HOF s and world champions than anyone in your era and then be protecting the 0, its a fkn braindead concept that only haters and empty heads can swim with and you fit the bill for both types.
              I wouldn't say "most decorated by far"

              Pacquiao stormed through twice as many divisions, fighting everybody and anybody in their primes and often in their backyards, which led to him getting robbed by people like Timothy Bradley & Jeff HOrn

              Floyd was a great fighter, but once he transitioned from "Pretty Boy" to "Money", he was less ready to fight great prime fighters.

              He made "business decisions", which is fine, but it's not going to get you all the props you want.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by MONGOOSE66 View Post

                Hmmm, no sheeit but you and I both know you can’t get into the hall of fame without belts. Sooooo
                Well didn't add to what excuses are you talking about because I have no idea of what youre trying to say, excuse for what?

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Roadblock View Post

                  Well didn't add to what excuses are you talking about because I have no idea of what youre trying to say, excuse for what?
                  It’s far too simple for your hamster wheel mind.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by The D3vil View Post
                    I wouldn't say "most decorated by far"

                    Pacquiao stormed through twice as many divisions, fighting everybody and anybody in their primes and often in their backyards, which led to him getting robbed by people like Timothy Bradley & Jeff HOrn

                    Floyd was a great fighter, but once he transitioned from "Pretty Boy" to "Money", he was less ready to fight great prime fighters.

                    He made "business decisions", which is fine, but it's not going to get you all the props you want.
                    Dangerous to be word specific, decorated can mean a number of things, I said Floyd beat Manny in so many areas and that's true.

                    And not personally about you here because its widespread, but Im sick and tired of the narrative that Floyd didn't fight prime fighters, all the while he was not in his prime, he fought them along a timeline that they all travelled, the idea is in a crooked hat when looking at the timeline of an era, you have the transitional guys from the last era and you have newcomers coming at the tail, and while this is going on Floyd is also moving into prime and fading out of his own prime across a 20 yr reign, I see this narrative roll of the tongue all the time but if you actually break it down its nothing but a ruse, he beat the best of his era that's real, and fans will make out like Floyd's prime is all the way across his career, he beat Canelo at 36 yrs old was it Floyd prime, as far as his boxing goes I think floyds prime was at 130/135 pounds, it was only how good of boxer he was allowed him to defy the odds and do what he did.

                    Who did Manny beat in their primes name them for me will you?

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by MONGOOSE66 View Post

                      It’s far too simple for your hamster wheel mind.
                      Answer it you fkn idiot don't beat around the bush what the fck are you saying I made excuses for, is it too hard for to clarify or are your scared of drowning?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP