Nelo's loss to Bivol is a total humiliation, what IF Nelo loses to Mell, what will it be called?

[Smash]

catįstrofe

[SceneBoxer]

Itās been very few and far between, when Canelo fights slick fighters. I think heās hoping the weight difference will make him have superior control. Mell can move well, and if Mell beats Nelo, Nelo is the laughingstock of the next 6 months, at least!
All things said, I really donāt like Jermell, but Iām hoping that he whips Cinnabonās a$$!

entirely hilarious ....

[Str8.2.Da.Point]

I will never understand fans like you.... if Jermell Charlo "is not losing to Canelo....PERIOD" then that is the definition of a cherry pick.

Everyone in Mexico wants Bivol or Benavidez....... but for some reason fans like you can't decide if you want a weak voluntary or a cherry picked opponent.

First of all, if you are going to half azz quote me, quote me correctly. I said CANELO IS NOT LOSING TO CHARLO.

Now to respond to your silliness.

No, mfers like you don't know the definition of "cherry pick" but like to run your mouth about fans you know nothing about.

Cherry picking involves CANELO picking opponents HE FEELS are the easiest opportunity...... ME SAYING that Canelo is not losing to Charlo is MY OPINION as a fan as I don't see anything that Charlo brings that threatens the victory of Canelo.... Fans don't decide sh**. We respond to the fights made and chant about the match ups we would like to see.

And get it straight.....I'm not a Canelo fan. I'm simply just giving my opinion on this fight. You clearly are a Man Fan as I stated something about Charlo and you got all offended because I didn't show love to your Man.....FOH.

[Str8.2.Da.Point]

As what I pointed out, Nelo was aiming further north in 200 lbs. Makabu and heavyweight Usyk... He was put back to his proper place @ 168 by Bivol and that's a total humiliation, stopping his ambitious "daring to be great" goal... Oh Nelo attempted again a 200 lbs. opponent in Badou but wants it @ 180 with rehydration clause... Hilarious... lol

By the way, Bivol schooled Nelo more (by UD) than Floyd schooling Nelo (by MD)...

You are starting to act like some drunk female arguing with her boyfriend twisting facts just to win a conversation.....lol.

As I said.....LOSING TO BIVOL is not humiliation. That is an opponent in which he challenged himself and found out that it was greater than his ambition. It's ignorant to state that he was humiliated because he lost to another great opponent at a heavier division. I guess 95% of the boxing world has been "humiliated" being that they lost to another opponent for whatever reason.

And a UD means that all 3 had the same winner. MD means one judge have scored it a draw. That doesn't mean it was a worst azz whipping.....Do you even watch boxing? The Bivol scorecards vs Canelo....All 3 judges have Bivol winning by ONE ROUND. The Mayweather fight, it was a draw by one judge, the other 2 had Floyd winning 116-112 and 117-111...... Damn the least you could do is use your WiFi connection to do some research before arguing with strangers exposing ignorance of the sport on you behalf.

[Str8.2.Da.Point]

He won ONE round. But I’ll bite on your excuse


Top guys should be able to adapt on the fly.

TF are you talking about.... Each judge scored the fight 115-113.....and even if you don't agree with the judges. At worst it was an 8-4 advantage to Bivol....

And stop with that dumb sh**. I didn't give you any excuse. I stated what actually occurred. Canelo had a game just didn't work because his opponent was physically able to withstand it. It doesn't mean Canelo is not a top guy.

Man some of the ignorant sh** said in this forum just because you hate Canelo..... Reality is, he just lost to a bigger, stronger fighter. "Top guys should be able to adapt on the fly"......FOH.... adults need to be able to use common sense, yet, you are responding with this nonsense.

[JakeTheBoxer]

How is losing to Bivol humiliation, I don`t see it.

[_Rexy_]

TF are you talking about.... Each judge scored the fight 115-113.....and even if you don't agree with the judges. At worst it was an 8-4 advantage to Bivol....

And stop with that dumb sh**. I didn't give you any excuse. I stated what actually occurred. Canelo had a game just didn't work because his opponent was physically able to withstand it. It doesn't mean Canelo is not a top guy.

Man some of the ignorant sh** said in this forum just because you hate Canelo..... Reality is, he just lost to a bigger, stronger fighter. "Top guys should be able to adapt on the fly"......FOH.... adults need to be able to use common sense, yet, you are responding with this nonsense.

Lmfao @ justifying those scorecards. **** outta here. Plant, Smith, Kovalev - All bigger than Bivol. Suddenly it's a problem


And yes, top guys adapt. They don't "stick to the gameplan" for 12 rounds when they're getting beaten pillar to post.

[_Rexy_]

First of all, if you are going to half azz quote me, quote me correctly. I said CANELO IS NOT LOSING TO CHARLO.

Now to respond to your silliness.

No, mfers like you don't know the definition of "cherry pick" but like to run your mouth about fans you know nothing about.

Cherry picking involves CANELO picking opponents HE FEELS are the easiest opportunity...... ME SAYING that Canelo is not losing to Charlo is MY OPINION as a fan as I don't see anything that Charlo brings that threatens the victory of Canelo.... Fans don't decide sh**. We respond to the fights made and chant about the match ups we would like to see.

And get it straight.....I'm not a Canelo fan. I'm simply just giving my opinion on this fight. You clearly are a Man Fan as I stated something about Charlo and you got all offended because I didn't show love to your Man.....FOH.

He did pick the easiest opponent. Benavidez, Morrell, Bivol.....No, out of left field picking the 154 guy who'd been inactive for over a year and had a fight already lined up.

That's a cherry pick by YOUR definition.


And for someone who claims they're not a Canelo fan, you sure are making a lot of posts, sticking up for him all emotional.

[SceneBoxer]

You are starting to act like some drunk female arguing with her boyfriend twisting facts just to win a conversation.....lol.

As I said.....LOSING TO BIVOL is not humiliation. That is an opponent in which he challenged himself and found out that it was greater than his ambition. It's ignorant to state that he was humiliated because he lost to another great opponent at a heavier division. I guess 95% of the boxing world has been "humiliated" being that they lost to another opponent for whatever reason.

And a UD means that all 3 had the same winner. MD means one judge have scored it a draw. That doesn't mean it was a worst azz whipping.....Do you even watch boxing? The Bivol scorecards vs Canelo....All 3 judges have Bivol winning by ONE ROUND. The Mayweather fight, it was a draw by one judge, the other 2 had Floyd winning 116-112 and 117-111...... Damn the least you could do is use your WiFi connection to do some research before arguing with strangers exposing ignorance of the sport on you behalf.

Nelo is the superstar, the face of boxing, the heavy favorite to win... Losing to the unheralded Bivol is a total humiliation....

Look at Nelo now, he avoided a rematch with Bivol @ 168 or 175 ... escaping from another humiliation...

[NC Uppercut]

entirely hilarious ....

Exactly my thoughts šŸ’