If Teo lost the 12th round he would have lost!!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Nash out
    BoxingScene Hall of Fame
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Nov 2018
    • 6126
    • 2,238
    • 1,851
    • 19,416

    #21
    Originally posted by BodyBagz

    After all of these decades, boxing refuses to fix itself.
    It's rare when 3 judges see the same fight the same way.
    No other sport has this problem.
    Too many poor judges who score fights through these criteria's

    1. If it's a close round that could have went either way, always give it to the A-side.
    2. If you want a certain guy to win and the crowd is behind him, crowd noise totally counts as a power punch.
    3. If you acccidentally dose off during the round, just assume the A-side took it.
    4. Always know the full score, don't be afraid to give the B-side 5 of the first 10 rounds, then find any way possible to give A-side rounds 11, 12.

    Additional info.

    If the fight was so one-sided that you could not score it for the A-side, as long as you did your best in following these criteria to give him a 90% advantage, we can't ask for more. Nash out

    Comment

    • TMT_HEAT
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • May 2017
      • 246
      • 47
      • 4
      • 8,591

      #22
      Originally posted by Fanofreason

      Clean punching
      effective aggressiveness
      ring generalship
      defense
      And let’s be honest, those last two criteria often get overlooked by both fans(casuals) and judges.

      It’s often why the guy who goes 12/41 will win a round of the guy who went 10/20.

      Comment

      • BodyBagz
        The Stuff Of Nightmares
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2020
        • 29772
        • 6,045
        • 6,437
        • 108,454

        #23
        Originally posted by Nash out

        Too many poor judges who score fights through these criteria's

        1. If it's a close round that could have went either way, always give it to the A-side.
        2. If you want a certain guy to win and the crowd is behind him, crowd noise totally counts as a power punch.
        3. If you acccidentally dose off during the round, just assume the A-side took it.
        4. Always know the full score, don't be afraid to give the B-side 5 of the first 10 rounds, then find any way possible to give A-side rounds 11, 12.

        Additional info.

        If the fight was so one-sided that you could not score it for the A-side, as long as you did your best in following these criteria to give him a 90% advantage, we can't ask for more. Nash out
        Fixing boxing is beneath you, but, when you get a spare moment, please consider it.

        Comment

        • Nash out
          BoxingScene Hall of Fame
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Nov 2018
          • 6126
          • 2,238
          • 1,851
          • 19,416

          #24
          Originally posted by BodyBagz

          Fixing boxing is beneath you, but, when you get a spare moment, please consider it.
          The boxing powers that be don't want Nash to fix it, as they know it will mean more losses for their cash-cows. Boxing judging is exactly how the powers want it to be. They know that any bad decision is moved on from come the next fight, and can even be used to build rematches, etc.

          Nash would have been willing to spend some of his vital and busy time to completely fix it, and beyond that, even reinvent the sport of boxing. All Championship belts would have been removed to make way for the Nash belt as well. One champ, one face, one name. And where on Earth is the boxing version of the Royal Rumble! It would be the most awesome, chaotic thing the world had ever seen. Nash out

          Comment

          • BodyBagz
            The Stuff Of Nightmares
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Apr 2020
            • 29772
            • 6,045
            • 6,437
            • 108,454

            #25
            Originally posted by Nash out

            The boxing powers that be don't want Nash to fix it, as they know it will mean more losses for their cash-cows. Boxing judging is exactly how the powers want it to be. They know that any bad decision is moved on from come the next fight, and can even be used to build rematches, etc.

            Nash would have been willing to spend some of his vital and busy time to completely fix it, and beyond that, even reinvent the sport of boxing. All Championship belts would have been removed to make way for the Nash belt as well. One champ, one face, one name. And where on Earth is the boxing version of the Royal Rumble! It would be the most awesome, chaotic thing the world had ever seen. Nash out
            I was going to stop reading @ ''don't want.....''

            F what they want.
            Nash does what he does and never asks for permission.

            Everyone would collectively lose their shlt if you were gracious enough to fix the sport.
            Somethings are meant to be.

            Comment

            • champion4ever
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Sep 2007
              • 23918
              • 4,090
              • 7,167
              • 202,915,785

              #26
              Wrong! Had Tayo lost the 12th round then the fight would have been ruled a majority decision draw.
              Last edited by champion4ever; 06-12-2023, 12:59 PM.

              Comment

              • crimsonfalcon07
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jan 2021
                • 5921
                • 3,517
                • 2,848
                • 1,030

                #27
                Originally posted by champion4ever
                Wrong! Had Tayo lost the 12th round then fight would have been ruled a majority decision draw.
                And then Taylor would have retained his belt, and Teo would still be on the outside looking in, and Taylor wouldn't have given him a rematch just like he didn't with Catterall.

                THAT'S what "to be the champ you have to beat the champ" means. Champ retains in the event of a draw.

                How do people not know this?

                Then we get these jackasses thinking ****** things like "you have to beat the champ by a wide margin to win the fight." Teo basically took over after round 2, and did whatever he wanted. This could be a 10-2 fight and Taylor could still have retained his belt. Those 115-113 cards are corrupt BS, and you've still got people saying "it's fine because the right guy won." Or "it's not a robbery because it was a close fight." GTFO.

                This is why boxing is still corrupt.

                Comment

                • Nash out
                  BoxingScene Hall of Fame
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Nov 2018
                  • 6126
                  • 2,238
                  • 1,851
                  • 19,416

                  #28
                  Originally posted by BodyBagz

                  I was going to stop reading @ ''don't want.....''

                  F what they want.
                  Nash does what he does and never asks for permission.

                  Everyone would collectively lose their shlt if you were gracious enough to fix the sport.
                  Somethings are meant to be.
                  Nash may have to use his Boxingscene Hall of Fame privilege card and light a rocket under these fools. Tear things up a bit. It's Nash's goal for boxing to have a Royal Rumble Champion come end of 2024. 1 belt holder per division, and the Royal Rumble champion. Nash out

                  Comment

                  • buddyr
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Feb 2014
                    • 5041
                    • 1,288
                    • 350
                    • 34,653

                    #29
                    i saw the fight, picked Taylor to win in dominating fashion, but could hardly give him any rounds. Taylor just followed Teo around looking to land a left hand while getting buzzed all night. The fight wasn't close or hard to score

                    Comment

                    • champion4ever
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Sep 2007
                      • 23918
                      • 4,090
                      • 7,167
                      • 202,915,785

                      #30
                      Originally posted by crimsonfalcon07

                      And then Taylor would have retained his belt, and Teo would still be on the outside looking in, and Taylor wouldn't have given him a rematch just like he didn't with Catterall.

                      THAT'S what "to be the champ you have to beat the champ" means. Champ retains in the event of a draw.

                      How do people not know this?

                      Then we get these jackasses thinking ****** things like "you have to beat the champ by a wide margin to win the fight." Teo basically took over after round 2, and did whatever he wanted. This could be a 10-2 fight and Taylor could still have retained his belt. Those 115-113 cards are corrupt BS, and you've still got people saying "it's fine because the right guy won." Or "it's not a robbery because it was a close fight." GTFO.

                      This is why boxing is still corrupt.
                      Unlike, Loma/Haney this was a very easy fight to score. I personally, thought Taylor threw in the towel after the fourth round. He just simply stopped competing and then Tayo just completely dominated and took over the entire fight afterwards. This fight was a landslide and a total domination victory by Teofimo Lopez, Jr.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP