Comments Thread For: Tim Bradley On Teofimo Lopez: "He's Dog Food For The Top 140s"

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GFunk23
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Jul 2012
    • 602
    • 108
    • 14
    • 14,759

    #31
    Teo hasn't looked good at 140. He's a small jnr welterweight and he seems mentally shaken. If this fight was 2 years ago at 140, I think Taylor kos Lopez but Taylor has been injured and inactive hence why I expect a competitive scrap

    Comment

    • paulf
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2009
      • 23735
      • 3,338
      • 2,100
      • 1,052,140

      #32
      Moving beyond 135 is one of those very hard speed bumps. We remember the guys who did and went on to be great at 140 and 147 - but for everyone one of those guys, there's a million that look like **** once they move up.

      Case in point: Brandon Rios looked like an unstoppable monster at 135... and proceed to look like some bum fighting at the bottom of an ESPN card at 140-147.

      Lopez has looked like nothing special since moving up. Bradley is correct in his take: the top guys are foaming at the mouth to take the fight for a reason.

      Comment

      • Madison Boxing
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jul 2015
        • 35364
        • 6,455
        • 3,367
        • 190,590

        #33
        i see an upset on the cards, i'm tipping lopez

        Comment

        • Liondw
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Oct 2010
          • 5994
          • 1,873
          • 34
          • 23,904

          #34
          Clearly no love lost between Teofimo and Tim.

          Comment

          • _original_
            Dinamita
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jul 2009
            • 17838
            • 1,872
            • 789
            • 67,167

            #35
            Bradley should not be commentating on this fight due to his personal beef with Teo. Hope they replace him for this fight. He’s already unbearable and creates ridiculous narratives, imagine commentating on a fighter he clearly dislikes?

            Comment

            • -Kev-
              this is boxing
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Dec 2006
              • 39953
              • 5,040
              • 1,449
              • 234,543

              #36
              Originally posted by IronDanHamza

              Wait wait, hold on, let me just get this straight here because now we are heading into bizarro world territory.

              You’re saying that Taylor-Catteral was “very close and debatable” but Loma-Haney wasn’t?

              How could you possibly hold that opinion?

              As far as I can remember, not a single press row media scored Taylor-Catteral for Taylor or a draw, unlike Loma-Haney where several either scored it a draw of for Haney. He was totally dominated on punch stats, and Catteral won 6 clear rounds + a KD (1,3,4,5,6,8) meaning that even if you give Taylor every single swing round, it’s still mathematically impossible to score the fight for Taylor.

              To the point the judges were investigated and one of them (Ian John Lewis) demoted.

              And in your mind, you’re telling me that Loma-Haney has more qualifications for a being a robbery than that?
              I really don’t care about Taylor-Catterall. I don’t know in what other language I can say that. I didn’t even score that fight, I literally just watched it. Yes, it was a debatable decision in that Taylor seemed to have lost. I had Taylor losing.

              But I don’t care about that fight, and I can’t sit here and argue back and forth with you about it, pretending I care for the sake of arguing.

              Comment

              • IronDanHamza
                BoxingScene Icon
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2009
                • 48999
                • 4,922
                • 269
                • 104,043

                #37
                Originally posted by -Kev-

                I really don’t care about Taylor-Catterall. I don’t know in what other language I can say that. I didn’t even score that fight, I literally just watched it. Yes, it was a debatable decision in that Taylor seemed to have lost. I had Taylor losing.

                But I don’t care about that fight, and I can’t sit here and argue back and forth with you about it, pretending I care for the sake of arguing.
                Ok but it wasn't debatable because Catteral clearly won 6 rounds + a KD so it quite literally wasn't debatable.

                Unlike Loma-Haney which was very debatable since there was about 3-4 clear rounds in total for both fighters.

                So I just find it quite astonishing that you'd label the one was actually a robbery from every metric you can look at it from as close and debatable and the one was that clearly debatable from every metric you look at it from as a robbery.

                Comment

                • BlackRobb
                  Truth Teller
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Oct 2022
                  • 5314
                  • 1,781
                  • 1,956
                  • 0

                  #38
                  Originally posted by -Kev-

                  I don’t care, good for Catterall

                  Fact is Taylor wasn’t going around acting weak as fck on camera. And post fight he was still acting confident.

                  Boxing is all mental. If you don’t have it mentally, nothing else matters, not even physical ability.
                  Why would Taylor act tough when Catterall OWNED him for 12 rounds???

                  Comment

                  • IronDanHamza
                    BoxingScene Icon
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 48999
                    • 4,922
                    • 269
                    • 104,043

                    #39
                    Originally posted by BlackRobb

                    Why would Taylor act tough when Catterall OWNED him for 12 rounds???
                    Bare in mind, Lomachenko literally cried on camera back stage after his loss. A loss in which he has nobody to blame it on but himself.

                    Incredible lack of consistency all round on this topic, really.

                    Comment

                    • JakeTheBoxer
                      undisputed champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Dec 2014
                      • 21141
                      • 4,630
                      • 2,798
                      • 123,960

                      #40
                      Taylor will win, because he is experienced at that weight. he was in tough fights with Prograis, Ramirez, Catterall. I don`t see Lopez winning this one.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP