Comments Thread For: Tim Bradley On Teofimo Lopez: "He's Dog Food For The Top 140s"

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Combat Talk Radio
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2015
    • 21727
    • 2,781
    • 6,368
    • 83,247

    #51
    Originally posted by TonyRespectful
    Even if it's true comments like this are not cool.Bradley is truly a hater.A small minded, small man.
    Well, if this was Floyd saying it, NSB would be calling for him to come out of retirement and fight him at a catchweight.

    Comment

    • IronDanHamza
      BoxingScene Icon
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2009
      • 48999
      • 4,922
      • 269
      • 104,043

      #52
      Originally posted by -Kev-

      I had Lomachenko beating Haney 9 rounds to 3. That’s not close to me.

      You know damn well you didn’t have Lomachenko beating Haney. Stop lying. You are just saying that so that you can freely throw shots at Lomachenko. Ever since post fight you have been making threads basically talking like someone who had Haney winning.

      Stop being fake as fck with your Loma-Haney scorecards. I see what you are doing. You really think Haney won and that’s how you’ve been talking about it.

      It’s okay, I won’t tell anyone.

      Also, what part is that you don’t understand that I had both Lomachenko and Catterall winning. Are you just arguing semantics here? You’re arguing just to argue? Is it an age thing?
      Er, no I had Loma beating Haney actually. I gave Loma rounds 1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 10 and 11. So, 115-113 Lomachenko was my score.

      You're saying I've made threads, plural. I've actually made just one thread, so, yeah, there's that.

      Er, no I don't think Haney won, if I thought Haney won I'd say Haney won, but, I don't think he won, I scored it for Loma 7-5.

      The fact you scored it 9-3 doesn't mean that there isn't an argument for Haney winning, you know that right?

      Yes I am very aware that you had both Loma and Catteral winning.

      Do I need to explain what I'm asking you or what is it? I've asked the same question twice and it seems you don't seem to understand the question? Or you're purposely refusing to answer and address it.
      Last edited by IronDanHamza; 06-08-2023, 07:38 PM.

      Comment

      • BlackRobb
        Truth Teller
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Oct 2022
        • 5314
        • 1,781
        • 1,956
        • 0

        #53
        Originally posted by -Kev-

        That’s the entire point. Taylor lost, has been getting sh/t on by fans and media for it, and still acts confident.

        Boxing is all mental.

        That’s literally the entire point of my posts. Not sitting in sorrow after a bad performance.
        I don't recall Jack whining or feeling sorry for himself. He simply wanted his rematch to get the belts he was robbed of the first time.

        Comment

        • Loque-san
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2014
          • 2642
          • 422
          • 89
          • 22,121

          #54
          Brilliant take from Bradley.

          That he thought Teofimo couldn't beat Taylor is one thing, but you just can't completely write off someone with that kind of athleticism and overall talent.

          Comment

          • johncods
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • May 2009
            • 7761
            • 421
            • 58
            • 14,300

            #55
            Originally posted by Loque-san
            Brilliant take from Bradley.

            That he thought Teofimo couldn't beat Taylor is one thing, but you just can't completely write off someone with that kind of athleticism and overall talent.
            Teo just took a crap on Tim's boxing IQ and validated his statements about Bradley being bias as a commentator

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP