Notice Tony did'n give him a longer time to recover because hes older, he just stopped it because he's older. But actually we all know the real reason and its complete bull$#!t. Rolly was kinda receiving a beating. He's already on the list of refs I never wanna see call a big fight again, but that list is bigger than the ones I'd keep.
But I'll try to call this out,
Is it in any rule book that younger fighters are given preferential treatment due to age against an older fighter? Or that a hurt older fighter means the fight should be called? At what age do the rules state that the fighter should be before an instant stoppage is required? If boxing feels that older boxers are in more danger, or need extra protection, then why dont they have an age limit?
You know I just ask because a refs job is to know and enforce the rules in the ring. (But we all know they make up their own to favor the A-side)
But I'll try to call this out,
Is it in any rule book that younger fighters are given preferential treatment due to age against an older fighter? Or that a hurt older fighter means the fight should be called? At what age do the rules state that the fighter should be before an instant stoppage is required? If boxing feels that older boxers are in more danger, or need extra protection, then why dont they have an age limit?
You know I just ask because a refs job is to know and enforce the rules in the ring. (But we all know they make up their own to favor the A-side)
Comment