Who knows, but bud had a better chance than guerrero, ortiz, ssm, bert o and maidana. But with floyd we know he often didnt fight who had best chance to beat him.
Comments Thread For: Terence Crawford Believes He Would Have Beaten Floyd Mayweather
Collapse
-
-
Nope, he'd never have beaten Floyd, or a prime Whitaker and even De La Hoya perhaps.
Leonard and Hearns would be too much as well.
Now, Crawford vs Pacquiao, well, I think Bud might have been able to edge him, but not sure if he could beat the Manny that beat Cotto and Margarito.Comment
-
Nope, he'd never have beaten Floyd, or a prime Whitaker and even De La Hoya perhaps.
Leonard and Hearns would be too much as well.
Now, Crawford vs Pacquiao, well, I think Bud might have been able to edge him, but not sure if he could beat the Manny that beat Cotto and Margarito.Comment
-
There was no fighter that you may insinuate had the best chance of beating him that wasn’t later exposed as ordinary.Comment
-
-
Too many here focusing on 'Money'.
How about you go watch Mayweather / Chavez (El Matador).
If you're unbiased, you will accept that Crawford would have been out of his element.Comment
-
Just because a fight was somewhat competitive or not a blow out which we are used to seeing in Mayweather fights doesn’t mean the fight could arguably go either way. PAC and Maidana soundly lost. The other 2 , especially Castillo now you have a point.Comment
-
Comment
-
Who has Bud beaten that he can make such claims? What is his biggest marquee prime name in his resume? Horn?Comment
Comment