Well Spence was fortunate that guys at 147 actually fought each other. And I think "all killers" is being a bit strong. Plenty of names on Porter's resume, but can't really say they were all killers. Can't blame Golovkin for guys literally handing over titles or not actually fighting him until he got older.
Better fighter Errol Spence or GGG (Skill) Prime
Collapse
-
Undefeated Thurman
Well Spence was fortunate that guys at 147 actually fought each other. And I think "all killers" is being a bit strong. Plenty of names on Porter's resume, but can't really say they were all killers. Can't blame Golovkin for guys literally handing over titles or not actually fighting him until he got older.
Undefeated Crawford
Undefeated Spence
Undefeated Brook
1 loss Broner
1 loss Garcia
1 loss Alexander
Ugas
Porter Fought killers. Win or lose....he was right there
Comment
-
I'm aware of his resume. We must have different qualifications though because some of those guys I wouldn't consider "killers."Comment
-
-
-
Would probably say ggg. Even at his age, he's giving canelo a decent fight. Sets up his offence so well. Spence is more high guard, less layered
I think spence's prime was before brook fight. He was a massive pressure fighter. Insane output. Had a layoff before brook fight and took some rounds to get sharp (and brook started to fade) . But became more of a outside jabber rather than the body puncher he was once after that. Physically looks past prime imo. Punch resistance is getting worse. But will obviously be in insane shape vs crawford. Its biggest fight he'll ever fight in his career, win or lose.Comment
-
-
Comment
Comment