Better fighter Errol Spence or GGG (Skill) Prime

[SplitSecond]

Spence is more skilled by far. GGG only looks good against tomato cans. He's struggled against every decent opponent he's fought even that Japanese bum Murata.

It’ll be good to see Spence at 36+ wondering what he’ll manage without his insane output. He seems basic as can be otherwise.

[Hustle]

Not officially but we all know who won that fight, we all got eyes man we know what happened.

And dereavychencko beat ggg

[BodyBagz]

Having a great resume is only great if a person WINS.
Losing to all of the good/great fighters you fight MIGHT earn a guy journeyman status (AKA The Del Bum Award AKA The Brass Medal)

GGG is one of those guys that if he had a tougher prime, he'd have at least 4 L's and not qualify for the Nelo sweepstakes.

[davef]

I picked Spence

I'm surprised people picked Golovkin everytime he faced elite competition he lost in fact his best performance vs a truly good fighter was a loss (canelo 1) he was good vs B+ and lower A class fighters tho

[Godsfly]

Bro.....I saw golovkin get outboxed by Danny freaking Jacob's and beat up by Sergiy Derevyanchenko. Spence has beaten all elite welterweights and everything around him. entire thread is s joke.

[Godsfly]

This guy practically said "let's not focus on resume" but an eye test because he knows spence resume ****s all over ggg lol its sad and embarrassing when u have to excuse a person's weak resume for an eye test. All agenda driven from that point.

[MikeyMike100]

This guy practically said "let's not focus on resume" but an eye test because he knows spence resume ****s all over ggg lol its sad and embarrassing when u have to excuse a person's weak resume for an eye test. All agenda driven from that point.

I did the skill set argument because many feel like GGG was avoided by many in his prime

[SplitSecond]

Do the guys that picked spence still believe this I wonder. After Spence didn’t even know how to trade jabs, is he still a better boxer than Golovkin?