Comments Thread For: Bomac Backs Crawford For 'Top Five Pound For Pound Best Ever' If He Beats Spence, Charlo

[Sid-Knee]

The delusion is top shelf. Crawford wouldn't be top 700 in history, let alone top 5.

[Sid-Knee]

If he beats Spence and Charlo, yeah I might put him in the Top 10, but not Top 5!

You would have Crawford top 10 ATG if he beat Spence and Charlo? Hahahahahaha. You're as deluded as Bomac is. Crawford wouldn't come close to being on the bottom of the ATG list. His resume wouldn't be close to being worthwhile.

[Bronx2245]

You would have Crawford top 10 ATG if he beat Spence and Charlo? Hahahahahaha. You're as deluded as Bomac is. Crawford wouldn't come close to being on the bottom of the ATG list. His resume wouldn't be close to being worthwhile.

You're probably right, but i'm thinking about Undisputed at 140, 147, and 154! Has anyone ever done that?

[Sid-Knee]

If he beats Spence and Charlo convincingly without any catchweights and rehydration clauses he will definitely be the best ever.

He'll the the first and only person to be undisputed champion in three divisions in any era but especially in the four belt era.

He'll have also done that while remaining undefeated.

Bob Fitzsimmons and Henry Armstrong were 3 weight undisputed champions.

Crawford wouldn't make top 700. It's insane to think he would beating these kind of fighters. Completely insane.

[Sid-Knee]

Undisputed in 3 different divisons makes you all time. It's never been done

135
147
154


That's what bomac is saying

You clearly don't know your history.

[Sid-Knee]

You're probably right, but i'm thinking about Undisputed at 140, 147, and 154! Has anyone ever done that?

Fitzsimmons and Armstrong have been 3 weight undisputed champions. They're real ATG's. Crawford is an insult to put forward as one. Seriously, this is deranged talk.

[Bronx2245]

Fitzsimmons and Armstrong have been 3 weight undisputed champions. They're real ATG's. Crawford is an insult to put forward as one. Seriously, this is deranged talk.

Bud's resume is pretty weak, but I could see how 50 years from now, 3 Undisputed titles would be viewed! Just like I, and many on here, don't know what significant fight Fitzsimmons or Armstrong had, nobody is going to remember that Bud's 140 reign was not even as good as Danny Garcia's. OK, you made me retract my statement!

[greeneye99]

If he does decide to fight Spence; I hope Errol whups his ass and immediately move up to 154 without giving him a rematch clause.

Wait a minute.............
You got like 10 previous Post saying Terrence Crawford would Never fight Errol Spence
Your post are like a Movie
Lolololol

[Madison Boxing]

whats his best win up till this point, ricky burns? postol? guy is barely top 5 p4p now let alone all time

[Sid-Knee]

Bud's resume is pretty weak, but I could see how 50 years from now, 3 Undisputed titles would be viewed! Just like I, and many on here, don't know what significant fight Fitzsimmons or Armstrong had, nobody is going to remember that Bud's 140 reign was not even as good as Danny Garcia's. OK, you made me retract my statement!

It's very weak. It would still be very weak beating Spence and Charlo.

Do you really not know the big wins Fitzsimmons and Armstrong had? Fitzsimmons was an undisputed Middleweight champion who is the only fighter in history to move up to Heavyweight and become undisputed there as well. He's the lightest in history to have lifted the crown. They both have a slew of ATG wins.