Thats rating Errol very high, I don't doubt they are elite fighters, although in my eyes they haven't fought any established name fighters that gives their resumes depth, I cant see any reason to rate them with ATGs just yet, they need to do a lot more before they are done.
Comments Thread For: Bomac Backs Crawford For 'Top Five Pound For Pound Best Ever' If He Beats Spence, Charlo
Collapse
-
I didn't think Crawford was undisputed at 135. I recall he only had one title at lightweight. And his resume isn't actually that great in terms of ATG talk. How many of the guys he beat are going to be HOF? Gamboa? Postol? Horn? Porter? Not really a slew of ATG's in his resume. I don't even think Spence will end up standing the test of time.
-edit- Super lightweight, yes. List should be
140
147
154.
But he's gotta make the fights and win them.
And that's what bomac said. If. Key word ifLast edited by Hustle; 05-02-2023, 06:55 PM.Comment
-
Both guys are brutal fighters. Bud beating them after starting at 135 would mean something.
and kambosos was never undisputed.Comment
-
It's very weak. It would still be very weak beating Spence and Charlo.
Do you really not know the big wins Fitzsimmons and Armstrong had? Fitzsimmons was an undisputed Middleweight champion who is the only fighter in history to move up to Heavyweight and become undisputed there as well. He's the lightest in history to have lifted the crown. They both have a slew of ATG wins.
Comment
-
-
I think trainers just throw this wild **** out there to keep their fighters in the public eye or something there is no way he believes Crawford will make top 5 p4p of all time that's straight delusional. Crawford hasn't done **** and the man is coming up to 36 years old be lucky if he makes top 50 nvm top 5.Comment
Comment