It will be mixed. Some will give him credit for "finally" beating someone with faster hands or whatever the myth is that is supposedly his kryptonite, others will point out jones already beat him in '93 in their "primes" and Jones is shot.
So he might get a little credit, but not a lot.
On the other hand, if he were to lose, even though he himself is 45 years old, prepare for the "hopkins has always been overrated!" "Jones OWNS Hopkins always & forever!" etc. etc. etc. type threads.
At the end of the day this is a grudge match that the fans wanted. That's all it is, this fight was made based on popular demand. All it proves is who is better NOW.
So he might get a little credit, but not a lot.
On the other hand, if he were to lose, even though he himself is 45 years old, prepare for the "hopkins has always been overrated!" "Jones OWNS Hopkins always & forever!" etc. etc. etc. type threads.
At the end of the day this is a grudge match that the fans wanted. That's all it is, this fight was made based on popular demand. All it proves is who is better NOW.
Comment