Toney-Booker On FSN Last Night

[Sir_Jose]

That is ******ed.

and so are you.

You simply are part of the "Opposition" party.

Booker won 4 rounds, and you are a jackoff.

You ever think about doing stand up?

[Run]

You ever think about doing stand up?

Nah.

Just ignoring jackoffs like you:
who do nothing but hate on people they coin as "******".

You are the classic "non-contributor."



Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

[joeboxer]

Hey guys can you chill the **** out. I easily win the ******iest post on this thread, with my talk about sandwhiches read the last page!

[Sir_Jose]

Nah.

Just ignoring jackoffs like you:
who do nothing but hate on people they coin as "******".

You are the classic "non-contributor."

Not doing a good job of ignoring if you keep responding are you, dumbass.

No one is "hating" on you. Saying you had Booker winning 4/5 rounds of that fight is ****** plain and simple.

[oldgringo]

Brohems and brethrens...Booker won no more than 2 rounds. It's not possible for him to have won more rounds because I say it's not possible. Case closed.


Joe...I read your posts about sandwiches. They were funny. I'm surprised nobody else had beef with that (I'm used to hearing that Toney likes sandwiches)

[Stickman]

Brohems and brethrens...Booker won no more than 2 rounds. It's not possible for him to have won more rounds because I say it's not possible. Case closed.


Joe...I read your posts about sandwiches. They were funny. I'm surprised nobody else had beef with that (I'm used to hearing that Toney likes sandwiches)

I have to agree here, and I actually couldn't give Booker more than 1 round. The down-side of that (for Toney) is that he should've had the guy out of there in 3, if he seriously intends to compete in the heavyweight division. I don't care how good a boxer he is, there's just no way he can possibly stay in the ring with a world-class heavyweight with big power and even reasonably fast hands for long. Klitchko would beat him down like a wife-abusing brother-in-law. But I think I'd actually prefer to see Golotta get 'hold of Toney first. I think it'd be a good fight, while it lasted. I don't know how Toney's chin would stand up to the abuse he'd get from a heavyweight, but I'd like to find out. And if Booker can get shots in on Toney, the others will too.

[oldgringo]

I have to agree here, and I actually couldn't give Booker more than 1 round. The down-side of that (for Toney) is that he should've had the guy out of there in 3, if he seriously intends to compete in the heavyweight division. I don't care how good a boxer he is, there's just no way he can possibly stay in the ring with a world-class heavyweight with big power and even reasonably fast hands for long. Klitchko would beat him down like a wife-abusing brother-in-law. But I think I'd actually prefer to see Golotta get 'hold of Toney first. I think it'd be a good fight, while it lasted. I don't know how Toney's chin would stand up to the abuse he'd get from a heavyweight, but I'd like to find out. And if Booker can get shots in on Toney, the others will too.

Byrd can take a good shot and he's a former supermiddle. Toney basically was a SM anyway and could hardly control his weight at 160. I think Toney has a better chin than does Byrd...we are just yet to see it because he hasnt campaigned at HW very long.