Mayweather Says Mosley Missed His Chance, Twice

[Iceta]

I don't want to see Mosley fight anybody else but Mayweather and I don't want to see Mayweather fight anybody else but Mosley. The thing that makes this fight a mega fight to me is that both of these guys were P4P kings at one time, and they are both speedy boxers. Lets do it to it.

[jrosales13]

[QUOTE=Horus;6205351]exactly, they are crying like hell.

If Pacquiao beats cotto.
He will have became the wba welterweight champion.
So in essense Floyd vs. pacquiao will be for the WW title.
and probably Lineal Championship.
How ironic would it be for the lineal WW championship to be determine by
a fighter who the welterweight divison is his 4th weight class in Mayweather
and for Pacquiao who the Welterweight division would be his 7th...

So Mayweather would be fighting a welterweight champion if Pacquiao beats Cotto.
and most likely it would be for the number #1 spot in the division.

since floyd is the former lineal champion and Pacquiao would be the wba champion[/QUOTE]

lol do you know what you talking about? Do you know who has the WBA belt? How do you figure that Pac beating Cotto would get him the WBA belt? Since neither fighter is the WBA champ.

Also, Shane is the linear champion. So there can not be a fight for the lineage that does not involve Shane.

But, relly do you who the WBA champ is?

[jrosales13]

This proves what a fucking idiot you are Horus. Mosley is the one who is the WBA champ. Cotto won the vacant WBO belt that Paul Williams left behind. You even have a detailed thread about this, and now you are contradicting that and saying something that's a total lie.

Aww man you beat me to it. I just wrote a post to the same dud about his comment of the WBA title.

[twinchrome44s]

Mayweather is better off fighting Cotto that is, IF Cotto beats Pacquiao. By doing so he arguably beats Mosley as well. If the test is: "beat the best" then Mayweather can take on Cotto and say he beat the guy who beat the other two guys, who are considered the best...and at the same time go a long way in enhancing his legacy. If Cotto doesn't beat Pac then Mayweather does have his pic between Mosley and Pac as far as legacy enhancement: Pac brings more notability and money, Mosley give him more validity and prestige.

[-Swizzy-]

If Shane Mosley thought last weekend's stunt will lure Floyd Mayweather Jr. into a fight - he was wrong. Following Floyd's dominating win over Juan Manuel Marquez last Saturday at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas, Mosley and his Golden Boy Promotions partner Bernard Hopkins entered the ring. A war of words broke out between Mosley/Hopkins and Mayweather. [details]

I totally agree with mayweather.

this fight would have been competitive 6-7 years ago, but mayweather would easily out class mosley right now.

[tito yuca]

Easy question. Im glad you asked. Because The 38 year old version with 5 losses just murdered Margarito. That says a lot. Also the myth of age with fighters...as a fighter myself, is illogical. Younger dont mean better all the time. Plenty of older versions have taken down broke apart and schooled fighters as if they were in there 20,s ! You can also learn so much from losing as well. Losing just shows you what you need to be better at and polish more. It dont mean you are a **** fighter all the time. unless you lose all the time. If that were the case i guess you can say Sugar Ray Robinson was a bum then Huh?
SSM isa very determined Skilled strong hungry fast same size great fighter...Nothing to Floyds Advantage. Because they no 38 dont mean nothing.

Margarito? LOL are you serious? You think the best defensive fighter probably of all-time thinks that what Mosley did to the worst p4p defensive fighter right now means anything? You are beyond ****** if you think Shane's performance against Tony tells us anything about how he'd do against Floyd. Just a few months before that fight, he had a fight with MAYORGA in which he lost a lot of rounds in. GTFO here. The dude who said if Shane was fighting Pac you'd be ****ting on him is right. You are just an extremely biased and ignorant Pac nuthugger.

[Pullcounter]

I totally agree with mayweather.

this fight would have been competitive 6-7 years ago, but mayweather would easily out class mosley right now.

that's easy to say, lets see floyd do it in the ring.

[Dave Rado]

So Mosley is supposed to be the one that takes the 0?? PPL need to relax, nobody is gonna beat Mayweather..

Woulda coulda

ATG status is based on who fighters beat, not on who their fans think they woulda coulda beaten. If he doesn't want to fight the best possible opponents he should retire again now.

Mosley has lost to boxers and Mayweather is a pure boxer.

Mosley lost to very tall boxers, Mayweather isn't very tall.

you got to see from Mayweathers point of view.

Not if you're a boxing fan you don't. His point of view stinks. Mosley is the #1 ranked fighter in Mayweather's weight class. If he doesn't want to fight the best possible opposition in his own weight class, then he should retire again now, and good riddance to him. And to all the so-called fans who try to defend the indefensible.

This fool Mosley never gave Mayweather the shot to be the man in 1999

That's such a ****** thing to say. Just because Mayweather keeps saying ****** things, doesn't mean you have to repeat them. Mosley moved up two entire weight divisions in order to fight the man who was rated #2 P4P at the time (and who shortly before had been rated #1 P4P, and had only lost the top spot due to a very controversial decision that many people considered to be a robbery). And he won. To claim that he was a fool for doing that, and to claim that he was ducking anyone in those circumstances, is just pathetic. People need to stop trotting out that ridiculous claim.

If Mayweather were to fight PWill or Pavlik at 160lb now, no one would accuse him of ducking Mosley in that situation - in fact he'd get massive respect if he were to do that - but that is an exact analogy of the situation Mosley was in in 1999.

The ****** thing is, Mayweather could have got back a lot of the respect that he's lost in recent years by fighting and beating Mosley, and the Cotto-Pac winner, and then ideally, PWill at 147. But he's blowing it big time with his ridiculous attitude.

[handler000]

[QUOTE=jrosales13;6205844]

exactly, they are crying like hell.

If Pacquiao beats cotto.
He will have became the wba welterweight champion.
So in essense Floyd vs. pacquiao will be for the WW title.
and probably Lineal Championship.
How ironic would it be for the lineal WW championship to be determine by
a fighter who the welterweight divison is his 4th weight class in Mayweather
and for Pacquiao who the Welterweight division would be his 7th...

So Mayweather would be fighting a welterweight champion if Pacquiao beats Cotto.
and most likely it would be for the number #1 spot in the division.

since floyd is the former lineal champion and Pacquiao would be the wba champion[/QUOTE]

lol do you know what you talking about? Do you know who has the WBA belt? How do you figure that Pac beating Cotto would get him the WBA belt? Since neither fighter is the WBA champ.

Also, Shane is the linear champion. So there can not be a fight for the lineage that does not involve Shane.

But, relly do you who the WBA champ is?

You are trying to correct Horus. Do you know who the WW lineal Champion is? The answer would be NO ONE it is VACANT!

[Panopticon]

If Floyd really thinks he can dominate Mosley at age 38, then just ****in do it. Sugar Shane is a beautiful name to add to his resume.