Fury & Warren are LIVID at Usyk

[Smash]

Fury deserves 70%, he's the star, he's the A-Side.

There is no precedent for a winner to get 70% in a rematch. AJ didn't go for that in their rematch did they? AJ got the lions share in the rematch, win/lose/draw. That's how boxing works.

If you beat the man, you get a better % GUARANTEE in the rematch. Not some weird floating scale % based on who wins or loses in the rematch.

Are you OK dude??

AJ this AJ that, u got AJ on the brain, usyk beat aj twice and was willlng to take 30%x2 v fury to get it done, fury bailed on 70%x2, all he has to do is beat the MW dosser to get that, one win and he gets 70%x2, he bailed, end of story, now we see who the real dosser is, its fury

[War Room]

AJ this AJ that, u got AJ on the brain, usyk beat aj twice and was willlng to take 30%x2 v fury to get it done, fury bailed on 70%x2, all he has to do is beat the MW dosser to get that, one win and he gets 70%x2, he bailed, end of story, now we see who the real dosser is, its fury

It's called precedence, ever heard of it? Open a dictionary, use Google, try it out lol.

Never in boxing history was the a rematch clause purse % based on who won or not in the rematch. Guarantee or you're pricing yourself out.

Usyk said he didn't want a rematch clause, I posted the video. B-Side wants a rematch clause lol...you can't make this stuff up.

These are outlandish claims to roadblock the fight. You're a superfan, admit it.

[Smash]

Never in boxing history was the a rematch clause purse % based on who won or not in the rematch. Guarantee or you're pricing yourself out.
.

who won or not in the rematch huh what does that even mean

if there is a rematch clause on a fight, the winner of the first fight will get more in the second fight (the rematch), the loser will get a lower split than the first fight

[joesaiditstrue]

for the winner of the fight, u missing that part?

rematch clauses are made by the a-side before the first fight is signed/sealed. they aren't negotiated by the B-side. if there's a rematch clause, it would be because Fury wanted one/wanted a rematch
imo I don't see this as Fury ducking. it's Usyk trying to get more than he's obligated to have. this rematch ordeal shouldn't have been a red line for team Usyk, they've just screwed themselves out of a super fight

Usyk should've taken the 70/30, won the fight, and then came to the negotiations with all the belts and all the power

[crimsonfalcon07]

What's hilarious is that War Room's post clearly contains Usyk saying that the rematch clause came from Fury's side, and he's trying to use it as proof that the rematch came from Usyk. Then he accuses other people of not understanding the language.

Usyk's team said multiple times on the 13th that the rematch clause was requested by Fury's side. Then after they called Fury's 70/30 bluff, Fury threw a tantrum about the clause they requested. The only time Usyk has ever fought with a rematch clause was fighting Brits.

What's BS is the notion that the undefeated undisputed heavyweight champion would be the B-side in the rematch, not to mention the already disproven notion that Usyk doesn't sell in the UK. Fury fans are a joke.

[Smash]

rematch clauses are made by the a-side before the first fight is signed/sealed. they aren't negotiated by the B-side. if there's a rematch clause, it would be because Fury wanted one/wanted a rematch
imo I don't see this as Fury ducking. it's Usyk trying to get more than he's obligated to have. this rematch ordeal shouldn't have been a red line for team Usyk, they've just screwed themselves out of a super fight

Usyk should've taken the 70/30, won the fight, and then came to the negotiations with all the belts and all the power

in a huge heavyweight unification fight with usyk beating AJx2 and having 3 belts, i think hes entitled to ask for a rematch clause, fury agreed to a rematch clause at 50% for the winner, but not 70% for the winner, so fury didnt want to make easy cash for beating the MW, usyk i believe only asked for 70% because greedy belly delayed and delayed in the talks and demanded 70% with 7 weeks to fight night, thats total BS and he got what he deserved, the nickname greedy belly and being exposed for being a coward and scurred of the MW

[War Room]

who won or not in the rematch huh what does that even mean

if there is a rematch clause on a fight, the winner of the first fight will get more in the second fight (the rematch), the loser will get a lower split than the first fight

When Usyk signed to fight Anthony Joshua in September 2021 in London -- a fight he won to capture three heavyweight titles -- the rematch clause that Joshua went on to exercise included a 50-50 split, according to sources. Not a fucking 70/30 you shithaus.

AJ was the star, Usyk wasn't. Fury is the star, Usyk isn't.

in a huge heavyweight unification fight with usyk beating AJx2 and having 3 belts, i think hes entitled to ask for a rematch clause, fury agreed to a rematch clause at 50% for the winner, but not 70% for the winner, so fury didnt want to make easy cash for beating the MW, usyk i believe only asked for 70% because greedy belly delayed and delayed in the talks and demanded 70% with 7 weeks to fight night, thats total BS and he got what he deserved, the nickname greedy belly and being exposed for being a coward and scurred of the MW

Usyk never got a rematch clause in his favor against AJ, even after beating him. If AJ would have beaten Usyk in the rematch, there would not have been a 3rd. AJ would have walked into the sunset.

B-Sides DO NOT GET REMATCH CLAUSES LMAO.

Usyk is the B-Side. The star of the show is Fury, these are undeniable facts.

If Ruiz would have beaten AJ twice, he would never have been an A-Side against Fury.

Usyk is pricing himself out with outlandish demands, facts.

Usyk left the negotiating table, facts.

Usyk is a liar and a duck, facts.

[Smash]

Not a fucking 70/30 you shithaus.

AJ was the star, Usyk wasn't. Fury is the star, Usyk isn't.


.

usyk was the mandatory for joshua ya dummy

hes now beaten joshua twice, has 3 belts, hes in a much stronger position than he was, hello u awake

[Smash]

B-Sides DO NOT GET REMATCH CLAUSES LMAO.
.

there are no rematch clauses for mandatory fights unless the challenger agrees to it, so hearn asked usyk would he take the rematch clause, usyk agreed he would for 50%, so usyk no belts no big wins at heavyweight struggled a bit v chisora in his last fight, got 50% off AJ in the rematch if he won

[NorvernRob]

When Usyk signed to fight Anthony Joshua in September 2021 in London -- a fight he won to capture three heavyweight titles -- the rematch clause that Joshua went on to exercise included a 50-50 split, according to sources. Not a fucking 70/30 you shithaus.

AJ was the star, Usyk wasn't. Fury is the star, Usyk isn't.



Usyk never got a rematch clause in his favor against AJ, even after beating him. If AJ would have beaten Usyk in the rematch, there would not have been a 3rd. AJ would have walked into the sunset.

B-Sides DO NOT GET REMATCH CLAUSES LMAO.

Usyk is the B-Side. The star of the show is Fury, these are undeniable facts.

If Ruiz would have beaten AJ twice, he would never have been an A-Side against Fury.

Usyk is pricing himself out with outlandish demands, facts.

Usyk left the negotiating table, facts.

Usyk is a liar and a duck, facts.

The game is up, almost everyone knows that Fury is to blame. His greed and demands have been exposed.

In the 2021 negotiations for undisputed with AJ a 50/50 split was agreed, yet Fury never sold anywhere near the amount of PPV’s AJ did. That’s the difference between a fighter actually wanting a fight and looking for a way out.

You need to open your eyes and realise that in the 8 years since the Wlad fight, Fury has fought Wilder. That’s it. Punch drunk Whyte was knocked cold by AJ 7 years earlier and near killed by Povetkin just 2 fights before.

The reason these fights aren’t happening is Fury.