Never thought I would see the day Usyk turned into a duck

[Stephankotyk]

Usyk earned more money vs AJ than Fury vs Wilder, and Fury fanboys keep saying Usyk should accept every term because of "paaaaydaaaaay". Clowns

[QueensburyRules]

There is an A-Side and a B-Side. Fury is the A-Side, facts. Thus...Usyk is the B-Side. If you can't accept Usyk is B-SIde, I'm not sure what to say. You're obviously a superfan or just having a bad day and being argumentative. Housewives know who Tyson Fury is.

- - An then the Dummy Side who don't know his ABCs any better than his 123s as you demonstrate.

Usyk at this point know the Saudis, after having been Burned by Blubber after Eddie got a $150 mil 50/50 vs unified champ AJ.

Blubber bailed to fight Deyonce in another low paying, low hanging spoiling fruit as before.

What grade was you in when they aged you out of grade school

[ELPacman]

Fury a clown if he's ducking a middleweight.

[kafkod]

There is an A-Side and a B-Side. Fury is the A-Side, facts. Thus...Usyk is the B-Side. If you can't accept Usyk is B-SIde, I'm not sure what to say. You're obviously a superfan or just having a bad day and being argumentative. Housewives know who Tyson Fury is.

Just think about what you're saying here.

If Usyk is the B side, and the B side doesn't get a rematch clause in their favour .... then doesn't that mean that Usyk must have been telling the truth when he said the rematch clause was there because Fury's side asked for it?

[War Room]

I know you understand boxing from past posts. But that statement sounds like someone who has read a few posts on BoxingScene and doesn't really understand the sport.

He might not have the same draw as Fury, but it doesn't make him a B-Side with no say. He's not a cherry pick, he's not someone the champion plucks from a list.

He's an undefeated 3 belt world champion, current Ring champion, former undisputed Cruiserweight champion. That's not a B-Side.

There is an A-Side and a B-Side. Fury is the A-Side, facts. Thus...Usyk is the B-Side. If you can't accept Usyk is B-SIde, I'm not sure what to say. You're obviously a superfan or just having a bad day and being argumentative. Housewives know who Tyson Fury is.

[786]

This fight's not happening, we've seen this sort of **** countless times and the fight usually doesn't materialise. I don't get the amount of time and effort people put into discussing and debating a fight that will most likely not take place after this round of "negotiations".

[Toffee]

B-Side doesn't get a rematch clause in their favor.

I know you understand boxing from past posts. But that statement sounds like someone who has read a few posts on BoxingScene and doesn't really understand the sport.

He might not have the same draw as Fury, but it doesn't make him a B-Side with no say. He's not a cherry pick, he's not someone the champion plucks from a list.

He's an undefeated 3 belt world champion, current Ring champion, former undisputed Cruiserweight champion. That's not a B-Side.

[War Room]

So this tweet is trustworthy, but Usyk's tweet in response, saying he didn't ask for a rematch clause and he's already signed off on everything is NOT trustworthy?


I forgot Tyson Fury was the textbook example of truthfulness on here.

Yes it is trustworthy because this is one of several roadblocks put in place. 50/50 is insane and the 60/40 with 60 going to the winner is retarded.

Let's read your thoughts on that dude.

This is what's going to happen, you won't respond to this with anything valid because you can't and not sound like a superfan. It's preposterous to support Usyk asking for 50/50 or 60/40 going to ther winner.

[QueensburyRules]

- - Usyk can't fight melting Blubber ready to be sectioned out to the rendering yard...

[_Rexy_]

They wanted a big split originally (50/50), then proposed a 60/40 split with the winner getting 60% (lmao), then a rematch clause for Usyk, now it has to be on such and such a date (Fury wants one, Usyk wants another). I'm lightly following, but that's what I got sofar.

So this tweet is trustworthy, but Usyk's tweet in response, saying he didn't ask for a rematch clause and he's already signed off on everything is NOT trustworthy?


I forgot Tyson Fury was the textbook example of truthfulness on here.