Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Canelo vs. Ryder Official: May 6 in Mexico, DAZN PPV

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by just the facts View Post

    Absolutely a crooked decision. So getting a crooked decision over a washed up Jacobs = can beat Charlo and Andrade? It’s your story, tell it however you want.
    Ryder also beat Callum Smith.

    Surprised at people's criticism of PPV. Canelo has been on PPV for years and years, why are you suddenly saying he shouldn't be fighting on PPV?

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by just the facts View Post

      Absolutely a crooked decision. So getting a crooked decision over a washed up Jacobs = can beat Charlo and Andrade? It’s your story, tell it however you want.
      It wasn't a crooked decision, it was a correct decision.

      EDIT: Apparently, nether of us have changed our minds since the fight. Fair enough.
      https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/b...ox-punch-stats

      Regardless:


      What exactly have Charlo and especially Andrade done to make you think they would defeat Ryder at 168? Charlo had a good win more than 2 years ago vs a smallish Derevyanchenko, though Sergiy had lost 2 of his previous 3, but other than that, what? Andrade has done nothing.​
      Last edited by 4truth; 03-14-2023, 04:49 PM.
      Goatintheboat Goatintheboat likes this.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by EnglishOxide View Post

        Ryder also beat Callum Smith.

        Surprised at people's criticism of PPV. Canelo has been on PPV for years and years, why are you suddenly saying he shouldn't be fighting on PPV?
        Canelo vs Fielding, vs Callum, vs Yildrim, and vs Saunders were not on PPV. They were all on regular DAZN. Maybe in the UK they were but not in Canelo's main market which is the United States.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by 4truth View Post

          Jacobs has been inactive and has slipped. That decision was legit. Jacobs' fight before that, with Rosado, could have easily been a draw or even a loss.

          Not crazy at all to think Ryder might beat Charlo and / or Andrade.
          Not crazy at all tbh.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by Nash out View Post
            Earn with Hearn strikes Gold again. People doubted him when he left Sky Sports when he was on top of the world and an international superstar celebrity, but now, if anything, he has became bigger and Dazn has took over the world, mainly due to Eddie getting all the best to fight the best, along with world class undercards, God-tier Women's boxing, and true and fair referees and judges.

            Thank you Eddie Hearn for all that you have done, and for bringing us Canelo vs Ryder, a fight that is certain to go down in history as a classic. Nash out
            Lol I love this bloke
            Nash out Nash out likes this.

            Comment


            • #46
              Ryder Is the GOAT. .... . .... . .... .
              Rebelrbg Rebelrbg likes this.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by thack View Post

                If they were ****** enough and they have been so far, then Hearn would replace Guy Fawkes on Nov.5th , look him up!
                Guy Fawkes it is
                I say they , the big boys at Dazn , torture Slow Eddie
                Maybe then we can get some truthful answers about ppv etc etc etc
                Oldskoolg Oldskoolg likes this.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by EnglishOxide View Post

                  Ryder also beat Callum Smith.

                  Surprised at people's criticism of PPV. Canelo has been on PPV for years and years, why are you suddenly saying he shouldn't be fighting on PPV?
                  Didn’t see Ryder/Smith fight but the reviews agree with you. Did I criticize the PPV?

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by 4truth View Post

                    It wasn't a crooked decision, it was a correct decision.

                    EDIT: Apparently, nether of us have changed our minds since the fight. Fair enough.
                    https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/b...ox-punch-stats

                    Regardless:


                    What exactly have Charlo and especially Andrade done to make you think they would defeat Ryder at 168? Charlo had a good win more than 2 years ago vs a smallish Derevyanchenko, though Sergiy had lost 2 of his previous 3, but other than that, what? Andrade has done nothing.​
                    Absolutely a crooked decision. Eye test tells me not only that Ryder wouldn’t beat Charlo or Andrade but wouldn’t be competitive vs either. Too slow. Do you actually think Ryder would beat either?
                    Rebelrbg Rebelrbg likes this.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      PPV? No thanks. I'll just catch up on sleep so I can be more rested for Inoue v Fulton early the next morning.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP