Why would tank have offered rehydration clause to someone (a smaller fighter) who didn't ask for it?
Comments Thread For: Tank Addresses Rehydration Clause: "He's a Bigger Fighter, Why Would I Not Have a Rehydration Clause?"
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
If Ryan didn’t agree then Tank wouldn’t fight.
He accepted all the diva’s demands and put himself at a disadvantage so we can finally get an important matchup in boxing. As a fan you should just salute him for that.Comment
-
Rehydration clause should go both ways. Tank will weigh more than 146 on fight night! Guaranteed! Has anyone even addressed this?
Comment
-
However, he could've done like GGG, and not put himself to a disadvantage, and still got the fight 3 times! Or he could accept the terms and not b!tch/cry about it, like B-Hop did when he fought Oscar @ 157! B-Hop actually came from 160 to 156, and still got the KO!
Comment
-
that fight shouldnt have even happened, oscar got his ass handed to him by sturm the fight before it and got a giftComment
-
If that's what it takes to get the fight done then yes, you must respect that but it shouldn't take anything away from a traffic match up .Ryan obviously feels he can do the weight so there should be no excuses if he loses .Personally I think it's 55-45% in Garcia's favour as I think he has the skills and power to KO Davis where I only see Davis having the KO power to win.Comment
Comment