Comments Thread For: Tim Tszyu Would Love To Swap Fists Against Errol Spence

[Curtis2]

He already beat Danny Garcia, something Crawford didn't do at 147, too risky for his taste. By the way, you might want to check the current P4P lists, Spence is higher than Crawford on most of them, they couldn't bring themselves to reward Bud for ducking Errol.

Danny risky for Bud? Now I know you’re in La La land. Bud chased both Danny boy & Jr Spence to the protected 154 division -

[Rebelrbg]

Danny risky for Bud? Now I know you’re in La La land. Bud chased both Danny boy & Jr Spence to the protected 154 division -

Yeah right, he could have and should have fought Danny plenty of times over 2 different divisions, but nah, that's a little too dangerous for Bud's taste....where's Rocha, Crawford said that he's got something for him, that's more like it. Boots and Crawford are available, never, where's Broner, Bud says that he needs to get at him, that's more like it.

[Ganondorf]

Nah you wouldn’t love that, Tim.

[Sid-Knee]

———-
“all the other comments you’ve seen me write”? What, are you stalking me on this platform? Do you not have better use of your time?

If you’ve seen my posts as you claim, you’ll see that I’ve been very critical of Crawford for fighting those two guys. So your comment makes zero sense.
Broner is a washed up fighter and has no relevance at 147 and is mostly known for his notoriety and being a wannabe Floyd. No American takes him seriously.
Clearly you guys do with your nonsensical comment that “Broner is a well-known name”. He is a joke.

Both examples you used are factually incorrect and plain dumb.
I’m still blown away by the fact that you came here to tell me you troll me. Wow!
You are seriously triggered

This is a public platform. Every other poster sees the comments from every poster. Why, do you write comments with the intention of no one seeing them? That would make it pointless. Sorry, but this is too ******. No wonder you had those ideas in your head out of nothing.

The point isn't whether you were critical of those two being opponents for Crawford or not. It's about the thinking that if you fight a well known name being an up and comer, you apparently put them on a "Pedestal". It made zero sense. As is you thinking me replying back with your own "Logic" as making no sense. Now i definitely know why you had these kind of ideas in your head. Haha.

We don't take Broner seriously either. But if you actually read my most, i said "Rightly or wrongly, he's still a name in boxing". We know Broner is a hype job. Hearn just wanted a known name for an up and comer. It happens all the time. There is nothing exclusive to this. But with your thinking, i can see why you're struggling here.

When did i tell you i come here to troll you? Not once. You made that up in your head as well. It seems to be a serious problem for you. Not just the comments on this thread, but as i said, comments i've seen from you in the past.