Has Floyds cherry picking and poor conduct harmed his standing in history?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • KingTito
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Mar 2006
    • 9391
    • 234
    • 350
    • 22,960

    #21
    As for as career, there are still fights he could take to cement his legacy, so it's too early to tell. As for his conduct, what does that have to do with his place in history? You're judged in the ring, not outside of it. Not every great fighter has been your typical model citizen. Floyd isn't a bad person anyway.

    Comment

    • Roger Mellie
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Oct 2008
      • 5969
      • 367
      • 385
      • 6,591

      #22
      Originally posted by KingTito
      As for as career, there are still fights he could take to cement his legacy, so it's too early to tell. As for his conduct, what does that have to do with his place in history? You're judged in the ring, not outside of it. Not every great fighter has been your typical model citizen. Floyd isn't a bad person anyway.
      I clarified what I meant about his conduct in a previous post. What I meant was his conduct in ensuring that the fights that really matter dont happen. Lets not forget,Floyd stated that this comeback wasnt about money.

      Comment

      • joartcc5
        Banned
        • Sep 2009
        • 1174
        • 79
        • 27
        • 1,487

        #23
        Originally posted by KingTito
        As for as career, there are still fights he could take to cement his legacy, so it's too early to tell. As for his conduct, what does that have to do with his place in history? You're judged in the ring, not outside of it. Not every great fighter has been your typical model citizen. Floyd isn't a bad person anyway.
        He's a liar, a racist, a con-man, a whiner, and a fraud.

        That's as bad as u can be.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP