Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Terence Crawford: "Jermell Charlo, He's Not On My Level Nor Errol Spence Level"

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by Lupara View Post
    Crawford seems to be a lot more vocal these days. Doing interviews. Talking $h!t etc.

    damage control ?
    See this comment a lot. You numbskulls realize he has no promoter now right?
    BLASTER1 BLASTER1 likes this.

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by SplitSecond View Post

      See this comment a lot. You numbskulls realize he has no promoter now right?
      Why would that stop him, Arum wanted him to be vocal and sell himself he was as quite as a church mouse.

      Its damage control that's obvious.

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by Bronx2245 View Post
        Jermell's resume @ 154 is better than Crawford's resume @ 140 and 147!
        Correct.

        Jermell had to unify against tougher opponents than Raymundo Beltran, Ricky Burns, and Julius Indongo.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by BillyBoxing View Post

          With a loss to Harrison and draw to Castano, not sure about that...
          Both were in their primes. Castano gives a lot of guys problems for some reason.

          The only fighter at 154 the Crawford could have easily beaten is/was Teixeira - and Crawford should have fought him when he had WBO 154. That would have been an easy win and blocked Jermell like he's blocking Spence.

          Like maybe that should have been his gimmick, just block unification at 140, 147 and 154 by only winning the WBO which is always held by the weakest champion. Don't bother with unifying, just block others from doing it and that's the legacy: as a career c*ck blocker.
          Last edited by Combat Talk Radio; 11-30-2022, 07:00 AM.
          Rebelrbg Rebelrbg likes this.

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by BillyBoxing View Post

            With a loss to Harrison and draw to Castano, not sure about that...
            Oh yeah, he definitely struggled, but the level of competition is better! We're not talking about Indongo, Horn, Benavidez and Khan!

            Rebelrbg Rebelrbg likes this.

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by SplitSecond View Post

              See this comment a lot. You numbskulls realize he has no promoter now right?
              Take it easy slugger.

              It’s an observation.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post

                Charlo showed he was top-tier when losing to Harrison, Martirosayan and Castano. Losing to those ATG's shows the highest of quality.
                Martirosayan? You must be one of those Crawford defenders posting that fiction. Also, Harrison and Castano were both brutally knocked out in the rematch. Charlo is getting in the ring with all the fighters that are ranked at the top taking the chances to be great, win or lose, as it should be, while Crawford fights Avanesyen instead of Spence. Keep dwelling in his glory of beating up mid-tier Mean Machines and Amir Khan, that's really reaching for greatness.
                Leicesterage Combat Talk Radio likes this.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by Leicesterage View Post

                  Both were in their primes. Castano gives a lot of guys problems for some reason.

                  The only fighter at 154 the Crawford could have easily beaten is/was Teixeira - and Crawford should have fought him when he had WBO 154. That would have been an easy win and blocked Jermell like he's blocking Spence.

                  Like maybe that should have been his gimmick, just block unification at 140, 147 and 154 by only winning the WBO which is always held by the weakest champion. Don't bother with unifying, just block others from doing it and that's the legacy: as a career c*ck blocker.
                  Damn, that's good, still laughing.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by 4truth View Post

                    Jermell has already said no. At least he's honest about it, so there's that at least.
                    He said no because he would be a shxtty friend to Spence if he even talked as though he wanted that fight, especially after what Bud just did by holding the last strap to undisputed hostage. So, Crawford prevents Spence from adding to his legacy, but Spence's friend, Jermell, is supposed to jump at the opportunity to fight him? I've hated better people than that, gtfoh.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by Rebelrbg View Post

                      He said no because he would be a shxtty friend to Spence if he even talked as though he wanted that fight, especially after what Bud just did by holding the last strap to undisputed hostage. So, Crawford prevents Spence from adding to his legacy, but Spence's friend, Jermell, is supposed to jump at the opportunity to fight him? I've hated better people than that, gtfoh.
                      If you are going to be a boxing fan these days, you have to have a pretty good imagination.

                      Carry on with your rebel self.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP