Comments Thread For: Crawford Shreds Spence's Resume: You Not The Head Honcho!

[The Akbar One]

Crawford is in no position to criticize Spence's resume when it is superior to his by quite a bit.

[Raggamuffin]

Simplified.

Bud was in a negotiation to fight Spence reports were everything was agreed on fight is on.

Bud said there is issues he wants full transparency.

While demanding transparency, he was double-dealing another fight and never let team Spence know that he was doing this, right up until the day he took the other fight, effectively leaving Spence in the lurch and effectively disrespecting the people spending many hours trying to reach a deal to fight Spence.


There is only a handful of possible fights for Spence, Thurman has always been a possibility nothing new here, the moment the WBC made Thurman mandatory the odds tightened, now they are enforcing the mandatory saying fight Thurman next or give up the title, So spence doesn't have a lot of choice here either give up a title he fought for, or fight who they make you fight to keep it, that's not Spences fault or plan, and he still has not said he will.

You keep repeating yourself. Im sorry to say, but the double dealing take is so fake to me, lmao. You didn’t make it up, but you believe it. Those YouTube bloggers defending Spence did. They’ll say anything about the biggest threat to Spence’s reign. It doesn’t even make sense, lmao. How many times do I have to tell you that Bud doesn’t have to tell anyone his business? He negotiated in good faith. Even said that he talked with Haymon…and couldn’t make a deal. That’s when I new that Spence/Thurman became a real possibility. You know as well as I know that Spence Bud wasn’t happening in November.

[Roadblock]

You keep repeating yourself. Im sorry to say, but the double dealing take is so fake to me, lmao. You didn’t make it up, but you believe it. Those YouTube bloggers defending Spence did. They’ll say anything about the biggest threat to Spence’s reign. It doesn’t even make sense, lmao. How many times do I have to tell you that Bud doesn’t have to tell anyone his business? He negotiated in good faith. Even said that he talked with Haymon…and found t name a deal. That’s when I m ew that Spence Thurman became a real possibility. You know as well as I know that Spence Bud wasn’t happening in November.

I think its simpler than that, he was talking to them since June and takes a fight with them, I see it as double-dealing, meaning you got two deals going at once and one party doesn't know anything about it, and it's not an honest way to conduct yourself, it's not upfront, it's not staunch, it's not stand up, its burning bridges.

Maybe we come from different walks, where I come from, respect is massive, you don't do the wrong thing by people you give them respect, he was burning the candle at both ends.

[Raggamuffin]

I think its simpler than that, he was talking to them since June and takes a fight with them, I see it as double-dealing, meaning you got two deals going at once and one party doesn't know anything about it, and it's not an honest way to conduct yourself, it's not upfront, it's not staunch, it's not stand up, its burning bridges.

Maybe we come from different walks, where I come from, respect is massive, you don't do the wrong thing by people you give them respect, he was burning the candle at both ends.

Bud told fans on his live that he told *** Prime that the Spence fight was top priority. That isn’t double dealing. Boxers can’t double deal in boxing, lmao. You either have one opponent or another. You guys took the evil route to defend Spence and say that Bud never wanted Spence. That’s a bonafide LIE! And Bud having a back up plan shows that he had doubts that the fight would be made for Nov…and didn’t want to be off for a whole year again.

[Roadblock]

Bud told fans on his live that he told *** Prime that the Spence fight was top priority. That isn’t double dealing. Boxers can’t double deal in boxing, lmao. You either have one opponent or another. You guys took the evil route to defend Spence and say that Bud never wanted Spence. That’s a bonafide LIE! And Bud having a back up plan shows that he had doubts that the fight would be made for Nov…and didn’t want to be off for a whole year again.

You continue to take Bud at his word and interpret it your way, if that's all it took to prove something, the jails would be 1/2 empty.

You're talking the evil route swallowing everything that comes out of Bud's mouth despite a lot of circumstantial evidence suggesting things are not what he says, Bud didn't write the bible you know that don't you, you understand he is capable of not telling the whole truth, if not youre a gullible guy because pretty much everybody is capable of lying.

[ELPacman]

What’s he being accused of?

Perhaps accused was the wrong word. I meant, if people keep asking him why the fight isn't being made and he jumps out with ****** reasons, he may be the problem.

At this point I don't really know and just about completely lost interest. So who cares really whose the reason for it but happening.

[Sid-Knee]

I have to watch Porter-Brook again. I remember having it a draw with audible commentary, them scoring it 7-5 Brook without. Porter was not winning the Crawford fight at the time of stoppage. The tide had already begun to turn a few rounds earlier.

Porter was definitely winning that fight with Crawford. And winning it good. Crawford wasn't doing much.

Yeah, just rewatched the Brook/Crawford fight. Brook won the second clearly by landing 12 punches to 1 for Crawford. Nothing remotely close about it. Clear Brook round. He controlled Crawford and had him uncomfortable and backing up.

In the 3rd, Brook outlands Crawford 11 to 4. Closer than round two, but still clear for Brook. No one can give either round to Crawford. As i say, Brook, even though he's shot and drained, won all the completed rounds. Had this been a prime Brook who was strong and had his punch resistance, he would have clearly beat Crawford. It's clear he controls the distance much better, even though he has the shorter reach. His timing is much better too.

Also look who had the most success at landing their percentage of punches on Crawford. Again, it's clearly Brook. Remember, this is a shot version nowhere near to his best. In fact, he's the worst he's ever been in his career. I include the Khan fight as he wasn't draining his body down as far which greatly helps. Same goes for Spence, who i think is grotesquely overrated. He isn't close to being top 10 P4P. Never was. Had it been the Brook who never went up and came from a bad stoppage loss with an eye injury and making the weight good, he would have clearly beaten Spence. he's just an all-out better fighter. It's clear to see he is.

With the Brook/Porter fight, all i want is 4 rounds for Porter. Just watch the fight until you think you have 4 Porter rounds then give me a bell on here.

[Raggamuffin]

Perhaps accused was the wrong word. I meant, if people keep asking him why the fight isn't being made and he jumps out with ****** reasons, he may be the problem.

At this point I don't really know and just about completely lost interest. So who cares really who’s the reason for it but happening.

All we can do is watch their live or tweets. We don’t have to imply, lie or blame either guy. My blame goes to Haymon. He had the Thurman fight ready for Spence from the giddy. Spence’s phony tweets from him and his reps along with the fake ass Homer Youtube accounts built some steam blaming Bud with evidence……FROM HIS OWN LIVE LMMFAO…!!!

[Raggamuffin]

You continue to take Bud at his word and interpret it your way, if that's all it took to prove something, the jails would be 1/2 empty.

You're talking the evil route swallowing everything that comes out of Bud's mouth despite a lot of circumstantial evidence suggesting things are not what he says, Bud didn't write the bible you know that don't you, you understand he is capable of not telling the whole truth, if not youre a gullible guy because pretty much everybody is capable of lying.

Why shouldn’t I take Bud at his word? When has he ever lied before? He didn’t give fans any scientific **** that we had to interpret or read between the lines. He gave a live in front of the world and Haymon nor Spence have come out and contradicted what he’s said. The rest of what you said s the problem. You’re not even talking boxing. You’re talking from a “he likes Bud” stand point. I’m speaking facts. #Facts

[Roadblock]

All we can do is watch their live or tweets. We don’t have to imply, lie or blame either guy. My blame goes to Haymon. He had the Thurman fight ready for Spence from the giddy. Spence’s phony tweets from him and his reps along with the fake ass Homer Youtube accounts built some steam blaming Bud with evidence……FROM HIS OWN LIVE LMMFAO…!!!

Your words and then you fell of the reality bus inside the same conversation, like yin and yan lol.

All we can do is watch their live or tweets. We don’t have to imply, lie or blame either guy