Why should Crawford publicly reveal the name of the hedge fund if it hasn’t led to the fight getting done? It’s hilarious that all the people who have no problem with Haymon’s obsessive secrecy - and lack of transparency over what financial backer is making it possible for him to remain afloat despite the fact his most commercially viable fighters only fight once a year - are suddenly saying Crawford has some obligation to reveal his backers.
As for Spence, he comes across as protected, spoiled, entitled and delusional : if someone tells you you can make a $25 million guaranteed purse - probably five times more than you have ever received for a fight - and your first question is “Yeah, but what about the back end?”, you’re living in a fantasy world.
What “back end,” you dope on a rope???? The $25 million guarantee is intended to grossly and fully overpay you upfront so “the back end” isn’t your problem to worry about!
Spence may think he’s some shrewd “businessman,” but he’s nothing more than clueless pawn.
I’m with Team Bud on this!
As for Spence, he comes across as protected, spoiled, entitled and delusional : if someone tells you you can make a $25 million guaranteed purse - probably five times more than you have ever received for a fight - and your first question is “Yeah, but what about the back end?”, you’re living in a fantasy world.
What “back end,” you dope on a rope???? The $25 million guarantee is intended to grossly and fully overpay you upfront so “the back end” isn’t your problem to worry about!
Spence may think he’s some shrewd “businessman,” but he’s nothing more than clueless pawn.
I’m with Team Bud on this!
Comment