Who would you consider more technical out of the two. This is hard, both are supremely skilled
Who is more technically sound. Usyk or Bivol?
Collapse
-
Tags: None
-
Comment
-
Usyk's is subtle. You always find yourself thinking if it's a style you enjoy watching. You can feel the same way with Bivol's, but it's siimple engage, disengage, in and out kind of fighting, which only athletic types could maintain for long distance rounds.Comment
-
Bivol amazes me more. His skill set is great , even though he doesn`t use uppercuts much.
What amazes me the most, he always looks so calm and he looks like he barely even moves his head, but he moves it just enough for his opponent to miss.
Usyk had close fights. Bivol never had any. And beating Canelo is something different than beating Joshua.Last edited by JakeTheBoxer; 11-06-2022, 01:32 PM.Comment
-
Bivol for certain.
Usyk has more substance to him but the question isn't who is the better boxer.Comment
-
technicality has to end in results.
Bivol gets landed on less than Usyk
Bivol lands more than Usyk offensively
Bivol takes less damage
he is the cleaner technician. And he's been fighting opposition just as good as Usyk.Comment
Comment