Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hearn Tears Into Wilder, Says He Is Not Hall of Fame Worthy: 'Frightening That He's Saying That'

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post

    I knew you would run away once i wanted to get into your questions. They weren't questions at all. Just a way for your cowardice to avoid having to answer to your comments. But now you want to refuse to answer on these too. Haha. You do nothing but humiliate yourself every time with me.

    Dominating and embarrassing you is too easy. What's wrong, knew i'd embarrass you when getting into your deflecting questions? How can i know who the supposed HOF'ers were that AJ was put in front of if you won't even list them? Why are they "Proven"? Surely you can support your position if it's clear. But you can't. That's why i asked you the specifics.

    Your questions answer my questions? You said AJ was promoted as a HOF'er. No, he wasn't. You haven't given any evidence other than a ranking that doesn't support your position. So, like you do, you changed the wording to suit. But now, you want to run away from your altered wording like a coward again. And where do you answer the question on our supposed inferiority complex? Point it out clearly?

    See you soon. I look forward to owning you yet again with your constant deflections because you can't support anything you say. It's just an inferiority complex that you projected.
    You’re still here? Writing novels and sh** but still can’t answer the simple questions of:
    1. Is Aj more popular than he was good aka overrated by ****** UK boxing fans?
    2. Did Hearn rank Aj as greater than proven hall of famers? Yes or no.​
    3. Who has a greater boxing legacy the US or the Uk.​​​​

    Good job confirming what I already knew you were. A white trash Euro puss with no real boxing knowledge. Pathetic.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
      You’re still here? Writing novels and sh** but still can’t answer the simple questions of:
      1. Is Aj more popular than he was good aka overrated by ****** UK boxing fans?
      2. Did Hearn rank Aj as greater than proven hall of famers? Yes or no.​
      3. Who has a greater boxing legacy the US or the Uk.​​​​

      Good job confirming what I already knew you were. A white trash Euro puss with no real boxing knowledge. Pathetic.
      You said your questions answered my questions. Well, my questions are about the supposed inferiority complex we have towards the US and that's why British fans went to watch AJ fight. Could you be specific and point out which one of your questions answers my question on this topic like you claimed?

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post

        You said your questions answered my questions. Well, my questions are about the supposed inferiority complex we have towards the US and that's why British fans went to watch AJ fight. Could you be specific and point out which one of your questions answers my question on this topic like you claimed?
        The fact that I saw you on the other thread defending a proven cheat only confirms your inferiority complex. Willing to throw out any dignity you had left to defend a cheater just because he’s British. Your boxing history is so far behind the US that you want to cling to and defend an obvious ped user because you’ll take whatever you can get. It’s like a guy who can’t get laid being willing to **** the fat chick just because it’s all he’s got with his extremely limited options. By the way, you still haven’t answered
        1. Is Aj more popular than he was good aka overrated by ****** UK boxing fans?
        2. Did Hearn rank Aj as greater than proven hall of famers? Yes or no.​
        3. Who has a greater boxing legacy the US or the Uk.​​​​

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
          The fact that I saw you on the other thread defending a proven cheat only confirms your inferiority complex. Willing to throw out any dignity you had left to defend a cheater just because he’s British. Your boxing history is so far behind the US that you want to cling to and defend an obvious ped user because you’ll take whatever you can get. It’s like a guy who can’t get laid being willing to **** the fat chick just because it’s all he’s got with his extremely limited options. By the way, you still haven’t answered
          1. Is Aj more popular than he was good aka overrated by ****** UK boxing fans?
          2. Did Hearn rank Aj as greater than proven hall of famers? Yes or no.​
          3. Who has a greater boxing legacy the US or the Uk.​​​​
          Where did i defend a drug cheat? No i never. But you're coming up with a shlt ton of fallacies aren't you little man.

          So, you won't answer questions to your comments but throw question to my questions. Then when i want to get into your questions by asking you to elaborate, you still refuse as they're not real questions. They're there to deflect. But guess what, you're humiliating yourself and getting owned no matter what you do. Like the good old days. Now you put another deflection in the way after you said your questions answer my question. No it doesn't. If it did, you'd point out how it does. But you refuse. I don't care about your emotional meltdown and deflections.

          Here you go...

          You said your questions answered my questions. Well, my questions are about the supposed inferiority complex we have towards the US and that's why British fans went to watch AJ fight. Could you be specific and point out which one of your questions answers my question on this topic like you claimed?

          Look at how easy it is to own you. You say these things due to an actual inferiority complex. You can't back any of your emotional comments up.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post

            Where did i defend a drug cheat? No i never. But you're coming up with a shlt ton of fallacies aren't you little man.

            So, you won't answer questions to your comments but throw question to my questions. Then when i want to get into your questions by asking you to elaborate, you still refuse as they're not real questions. They're there to deflect. But guess what, you're humiliating yourself and getting owned no matter what you do. Like the good old days. Now you put another deflection in the way after you said your questions answer my question. No it doesn't. If it did, you'd point out how it does. But you refuse. I don't care about your emotional meltdown and deflections.

            Here you go...

            You said your questions answered my questions. Well, my questions are about the supposed inferiority complex we have towards the US and that's why British fans went to watch AJ fight. Could you be specific and point out which one of your questions answers my question on this topic like you claimed?

            Look at how easy it is to own you. You say these things due to an actual inferiority complex. You can't back any of your emotional comments up.
            more novels. You’re in the other thread defending Benn and randomly bringing up Wilder which is all part of your obvious inferiority complex. It’s fkn weird. What’s even weirder is your refusal to answer :
            1. Is Aj more popular than he was good aka overrated by ****** UK boxing fans?
            2. Did Hearn rank Aj as greater than proven hall of famers? Yes or no.​
            3. Who has a greater boxing legacy the US or the Uk.​​​​​


            Comment


            • Deontay ONE fight away from Hall of Fame.

              All he's gotta do is knockout Usyk and he goes in the history books.

              Suck it hearn, nothing you can do. The Bronze Bomber chasing greatness.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
                more novels. You’re in the other thread defending Benn and randomly bringing up Wilder which is all part of your obvious inferiority complex. It’s fkn weird. What’s even weirder is your refusal to answer :
                1. Is Aj more popular than he was good aka overrated by ****** UK boxing fans?
                2. Did Hearn rank Aj as greater than proven hall of famers? Yes or no.​
                3. Who has a greater boxing legacy the US or the Uk.​​​​​

                I've answered one question. You haven't got any HOF'ers that AJ was put ahead of. If you did, you'd list them. Hell, that wasn't even the original point. You said Eddie promoted AJ as a HOF'er when he didn't. So you're wrong on both counts.

                What did i say in regard to Benn?

                I randomly talk about Wilder on a boxing site? Yeah, it's so random, man. Haha.

                Let's do another question and have you deflect as well.

                You can't judge AJ on the basis of how many fights he's had compared to fighters who have finished their careers. Tell me the Heavyweights that have fought and beaten the kind of fighters AJ has in 27 fights to get a proper reading? Then we'll see if AJ is "More popular than he is good".

                Then tell me all the HOF Heavyweights that haven't lost to fighters on Usyk's and Ruiz's level. Those you don't put down will be hype jobs who were nothing but overrated.

                See you soon.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post

                  I've answered one question. You haven't got any HOF'ers that AJ was put ahead of. If you did, you'd list them. Hell, that wasn't even the original point. You said Eddie promoted AJ as a HOF'er when he didn't. So you're wrong on both counts.

                  What did i say in regard to Benn?

                  I randomly talk about Wilder on a boxing site? Yeah, it's so random, man. Haha.

                  Let's do another question and have you deflect as well.

                  You can't judge AJ on the basis of how many fights he's had compared to fighters who have finished their careers. Tell me the Heavyweights that have fought and beaten the kind of fighters AJ has in 27 fights to get a proper reading? Then we'll see if AJ is "More popular than he is good".

                  Then tell me all the HOF Heavyweights that haven't lost to fighters on Usyk's and Ruiz's level. Those you don't put down will be hype jobs who were nothing but overrated.

                  See you soon.
                  I’ve already mentioned hall of famers that weren’t even on Eddie’s list who are clearly greater than Aj and it’s not even close. Just scroll back. Here’s a hint, the respectively started their careers 48-0 & 49-0 and we’re first ballot hall of famers. In addition:

                  1. Is Aj more popular than he was good aka overrated by ****** UK boxing fans?
                  2. Did Hearn rank Aj as greater than proven hall of famers? Yes or no.​
                  3. Who has a greater boxing legacy the US or the Uk.​​​​​​



                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
                    I’ve already mentioned hall of famers that weren’t even on Eddie’s list who are clearly greater than Aj and it’s not even close. Just scroll back. Here’s a hint, the respectively started their careers 48-0 & 49-0 and we’re first ballot hall of famers. In addition:

                    1. Is Aj more popular than he was good aka overrated by ****** UK boxing fans?
                    2. Did Hearn rank Aj as greater than proven hall of famers? Yes or no.​
                    3. Who has a greater boxing legacy the US or the Uk.​​​​​​


                    I've never seen a fighter who has started out at 48-0. They usually start at no wins or losses and work themselves up 1 fight at a time. They must be great then being able to do that.

                    So when i moved onto the next question, you all of a sudden want to go back to the first question you kept deflecting away from? Is that how it works with fear? You'll want to discuss the second question only when i move onto the third?

                    Right, Marciano and Holmes it is. Tell me every elite fighter they beat that made them a legitimate HOF'er? Remember, try not to contradict yourself or use hypocrisy. You know what you're like with putting your foot in it then going very quiet with your backing away.

                    See you soon.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post

                      I've never seen a fighter who has started out at 48-0. They usually start at no wins or losses and work themselves up 1 fight at a time. They must be great then being able to do that.

                      So when i moved onto the next question, you all of a sudden want to go back to the first question you kept deflecting away from? Is that how it works with fear? You'll want to discuss the second question only when i move onto the third?

                      Right, Marciano and Holmes it is. Tell me every elite fighter they beat that made them a legitimate HOF'er? Remember, try not to contradict yourself or use hypocrisy. You know what you're like with putting your foot in it then going very quiet with your backing away.

                      See you soon.
                      So first you wanted to argue that Joe Frazier and George Foreman aren’t hall of fame worthy and now want to argue that Larry Holmes and Marciano aren’t either. At the same time praising the so called greatness of Prince Nasim Hamed who faced 1 prime elite fighter and got utterly embarrassed. Lmaooooo. Keep making yourself look ****** and avoiding the basic questions of :
                      1. Is Aj more popular than he was good aka overrated by ****** UK boxing fans?
                      2. Did Hearn rank Aj as greater than proven hall of famers? Yes or no.​
                      3. Who has a greater boxing legacy the US or the Uk.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP