Comments Thread For: Hearn Hits Back at Jake Paul's Allegations: His Comments Will Be Dealt With Appropriately
Collapse
-
-
Promoters don’t have to slip judges an envelope under the table. They know where their paycheck comes from. Boxing judging is at best a highly subjective affair. These comment sections make that abundantly clear. Jake Paul, as any promoter, has a larger bias than most of us. He’s just another uninformed conspiracy twit. Confirmation bias is the plight of humankind.Comment
-
Hearn has to respond or what will Jake say next to his millions of fans who don't know boxing politicsComment
-
normally I would not click on a youtuber article, but the headline was too juicy to ignore. Now the irony of it all, it takes a youtuber to shine light, and probably get the public's attention, on the shadiness of boxing judges that boxing fans have been screaming about all these years.
Everyone who watched the fight (knows) it’s not a split decision.
Comment
-
-
Jake Paul is really scraping the barrel in regards to Taylor v serrano fight. The judges got it spot on. Serrano gave up after the 5th and handed the last 4 rounds to Taylor. You can't expect to win a 10 round fight by losing 2 out of the first 4 rounds and then lose the last 4 rounds Jake. It's simple mathematics. Taylor won 6 definite rounds and possibly 7. Me thinks Jake Paul is just a bad loser. I don't have an opinion on the usyk v Joshua bout.Comment
Comment