Comments Thread For: Hearn Hits Back at Jake Paul's Allegations: His Comments Will Be Dealt With Appropriately
Collapse
-
-
Promoters don’t have to slip judges an envelope under the table. They know where their paycheck comes from. Boxing judging is at best a highly subjective affair. These comment sections make that abundantly clear. Jake Paul, as any promoter, has a larger bias than most of us. He’s just another uninformed conspiracy twit. Confirmation bias is the plight of humankind.Comment
-
Hearn has to respond or what will Jake say next to his millions of fans who don't know boxing politicsComment
-
I wouldn't give Paul too much credit. He also said...normally I would not click on a youtuber article, but the headline was too juicy to ignore. Now the irony of it all, it takes a youtuber to shine light, and probably get the public's attention, on the shadiness of boxing judges that boxing fans have been screaming about all these years.
Split decision isn't a scorecard dopey.Everyone who watched the fight (knows) it’s not a split decision.
Comment
-
-
Jake Paul is really scraping the barrel in regards to Taylor v serrano fight. The judges got it spot on. Serrano gave up after the 5th and handed the last 4 rounds to Taylor. You can't expect to win a 10 round fight by losing 2 out of the first 4 rounds and then lose the last 4 rounds Jake. It's simple mathematics. Taylor won 6 definite rounds and possibly 7. Me thinks Jake Paul is just a bad loser. I don't have an opinion on the usyk v Joshua bout.Comment
Comment