I had it 115-113 canelo it was close

[satiev1]

I gave ggg rds 9-12 and the first. Canelo took the last 4 rds off and rd 1 ggg won with the jabs. Rd 6-7 was also very close. The dazn commentators were **** riding canelo hard.

[Boxfan83]

That fight was NOT close at all. Idk wtf people were watching. It got boring because Canelo was landing at will. And compubox is ******ed.

[ralex]

Not close at all.

[HanzGruber]

Well you’re wrong

[Boxing-1013]

I think GGG's style just allows his haters to score fights and rounds against him.

He generally has a high output and lands a lot of punches, but will also take 5 or 6 clear (not necessarily hard, but clear) shots in any given round too.

Those who have issues with scoring, or an agenda, can find a way to ignore the punches GGG lands and just focus on the punches he takes.

Honestly it's very odd for me to see because I'd think honest people would have an easy time scoring rounds for him in most fights. He just lands very often and clean generally speaking.

[j0zef]

You're on the right track. Round 1 ******. I hate scoring these since nothing happens, but who you give it to makes a lot of difference. It wasn't clear, it was boring, and it shouldn't matter.

I gave 9-12 to Golovkin as well, however the reason folks are outraged is because those rounds, even though IMO they were Golovkin rounds, some were close. G was the aggressor, the ring general, and landed good shots, but he still took some back. The rounds that Canelo banked, 2-7, were clear. G didn't put up much resistance.

7-5 is being VERY generous to G. 9-3 or 8-4 are perfectly fair. Good fight by Canelo, and G took too long to gain confidence.

[Damn Wicked]

I gave ggg rds 9-12 and the first. Canelo took the last 4 rds off and rd 1 ggg won with the jabs. Rd 6-7 was also very close. The dazn commentators were **** riding canelo hard.

The commentating was definitely biased and far from accurate. They had a story to sell the viewers and the viewers were very receptive to the narrative because that was the prediction and story that we've been reading on Boxing Scene and in articles for the last year (Golovkin is way too old and shot, so he's gonna be KO'd by Canelo), except we saw how hard Canelo had to work to maintain his lead over Golovkin and he was in deep later in the fight. Canelo also lost the first round clearly. But we need to stick with the narrative of "easy work for Canelo". No need to watch the fight, but instead we should just listen to the announcers and what we believe "should have happened". Supposedly Canelo didn't even break a sweat..

[Silence]

GGGroupies keep making themselves ****** again.

[PinkGod]

I'm not an AlvaRoid fan, i can admit that this fight wasn't close...like at all.

[Fists_of_Fury]

I gave ggg rds 9-12 and the first. Canelo took the last 4 rds off and rd 1 ggg won with the jabs. Rd 6-7 was also very close. The dazn commentators were **** riding canelo hard.

Put the crack pipe down and go get your eyes checked.