Tweet
I’ve seen him and those DAZN stooges pushing that narrative. It’s utter bullsh**.
This third fight is well past it’s sell by date and GGG isn’t the same fighter from 4-5 years ago. Canelo beating a 40 yr old Golovkin doesn’t really define anything and boxing history tells us that.
When we think of Ray Leonard vs Tommy Hearns, do we think about Leonard-Hearns 1 in 81 or Leonard-Hearns 2 in 89?
When we think of Leonard vs Duran do we think of the 2 fights in 1980 or the 1989 fight?
Same can be said about Tarver-Jones 3, B-Hop-Jones 2. You can even go back as far Saddler-Pep 4 in 1950 or Fullmer-Robinson 3 and 4 in the 60’s. The list is endless.
Beating an aged faded version of your rival who you’re now expected to beat comfortably doesn’t define a rivalry. Especially when you’re the guy who delayed the third fight. It’s absolutely laughable.
This third fight is well past it’s sell by date and GGG isn’t the same fighter from 4-5 years ago. Canelo beating a 40 yr old Golovkin doesn’t really define anything and boxing history tells us that.
When we think of Ray Leonard vs Tommy Hearns, do we think about Leonard-Hearns 1 in 81 or Leonard-Hearns 2 in 89?
When we think of Leonard vs Duran do we think of the 2 fights in 1980 or the 1989 fight?
Same can be said about Tarver-Jones 3, B-Hop-Jones 2. You can even go back as far Saddler-Pep 4 in 1950 or Fullmer-Robinson 3 and 4 in the 60’s. The list is endless.
Beating an aged faded version of your rival who you’re now expected to beat comfortably doesn’t define a rivalry. Especially when you’re the guy who delayed the third fight. It’s absolutely laughable.
Comment