FAO: Cotto Fans
Collapse
-
-
catch weight is for fighters whose "capable" and can adopt to another weight he's fighting.. theres nothing wrong pac's fighting these WW.. i mean, he has some skills to be at that level, cotto is not really that huge and tallIt only makes the odds better for me...
the size difference from last night made me more confident that Cotto can and will KO Pac..and yes I know..Cotto is no Mayweather..but if you say Cotto is not a decent counter-puncher and a much harder puncher than Mayweather than you're pathetic!..Pac doesn't have JMM's ring intelligence nor his defence..and Cotto is pretty damn precise/accurate!..so once he lands a few BOMBS..it'll put Pac at a different gameplan..like wanting to trade..and that's when it'll really favor Cotto..
Pac and JMM belong at 140 at the most..and last night was half the proof of that..and Nov 14th Cotto will seal that ****..
I'm just hoping that after these ridiculous match-ups..this catch-weight **** goes in the ****ter and we can get a WW tourney going with Cotto, Mayweather, Mosley, Clottey, Berto, and Margarito if he comes back to WW after his suspension..
Comment
-
cotto does not have great handspeed. it is good, but not great. cotto's timing is better than his handspeed.
agree, skills wise they are about the same
you crazy. floyd is way more accurate than cotto.
are you guys still basing floyd's skills off the castillo fight? floyd had an injury in that fight.when floyd is pressured he throws ****ty punches(castillo 1),
nah man, floyd is more accurate all over the place. inside, outside, everywhere.the only time floyd is more accurate than cotto is when you let him stay outside or when he dances out of the way.
hells no. floyd is way faster than cotto.Also, punch speed is not that much different IMO.
yepOverall tho, I have to agree with you floyd has more skill.Comment
-
everyone has there head up there butt .... cotto cannot loose to a little asain ... hes beatin zab and mosely next fight should be with mayweather or margarito lol really want to see that one again badleyComment
-
Comment
-
Comment