Why is Tyson Fury doing this?
Collapse
-
-
Like I said, I depends on if there's a referee who enforces the rules. Rules are rules. You can't punch people in the back of the head, choke them with your forearm, clinch every chance you get and lean. These are all Fury moves, and the are explicitly called fouls and should be penalized.Comment
-
Fury wants to be GOAT, so you need a dance partner to bring best out of you. Usyk might make us see fury at his best, see what he can do. Same for fury bringing out best of usykComment
-
I don't know man. This is the same Fury who punched himself in the face.
People are putting far too stock in Fury's performance against Cunningham which was many years ago now.
Fury had no respect for Cunningham whatsoever, he was messing around in there, and he was dropped because he dropped both of his hands and was caught square on.
He had no trainer in his corner and wasn't in the physical condition that he was in for Klitschko.
Fury isn't a fool, he won't be messing around against Usyk, he will be 100% ready for business.
8gYe.gifComment
-
Fury moves lol.
Like I said, I depends on if there's a referee who enforces the rules. Rules are rules. You can't punch people in the back of the head, choke them with your forearm, clinch every chance you get and lean. These are all Fury moves, and the are explicitly called fouls and should be penalized.
Boxers have been fighting rough since the sport started, it's a fight, not a tickling contest.
If Usyk is as great as you claim he is, he should be capable of dealing with roughhouse tactics.Comment
-
Wlad punched himself in the face v Jennings. Who cares?
I don't know man. This is the same Fury who punched himself in the face.
8gYe.gif
Fury ended the domination of the last era, beating one of the longest reigning champs ever. He’s also beaten the longest reigning one of this era.
He’s held every belt, never lost them in the ring.
he’s the best heavyweight today and in reality probably beats anybody in history head to head.
Get used to it. Enjoy it while he’s around. You’ll slate him now but in 20 years you’ll be saying about the new crop “they wouldn’t have beaten Fury”. Like people slated Lewis 25 years ago but now use him as an example.Comment
-
First, this is boxing, not mixed martial arts. I see Fury too often get guys in a guillotine, for example, and manhandle them around the ring.
Second, in my book, if you're are so good, then why cheat? Normally boxers who are A grade level don't have to cheat, but I see Fury cheat when he feels like he can't win otherwise. Case in point, Cunningham. Fury came out doing his normal thing but Cunningham was fighting a smart, intelligent fight and dropped him. Next thing you know, Fury stopped boxing and began wrestling. If a boxer is as good as they say he is, then he shouldn't have to cheat to win.
Comment
-
I never thought much of Wilder, to be honest. And when Ruiz obliterates Ortiz this weekend, it'll be evident that Wilder was garbage. You can't be good and go life and death with a 50 year old boxer.
Wlad punched himself in the face v Jennings. Who cares?
Fury ended the domination of the last era, beating one of the longest reigning champs ever. He’s also beaten the longest reigning one of this era.
He’s held every belt, never lost them in the ring.
he’s the best heavyweight today and in reality probably beats anybody in history head to head.
Get used to it. Enjoy it while he’s around. You’ll slate him now but in 20 years you’ll be saying about the new crop “they wouldn’t have beaten Fury”. Like people slated Lewis 25 years ago but now use him as an example.
I'm saying this because Wilder is arguably Fury's best win. Personally, I think Klitschko is but many believe Wilder is his best win. And if that's the case, what would it mean for Fury's legacy if he loses to Uysk?Comment
Comment