Comments Thread For: WBA, Mendoza Named As Defendants In Charr's Amended Lawsuit Against Don King

[WBC WBA IBF]

I'll just repost this...

Which media was it? And why would they need to see the "Private" conditions? For what purpose? If Media are shown "Private" conditions, then they're not private are they?

Wouldn't matter. Espinoza proved Sky got UK TV and Hearn didn't dispute that the screen shot was legitimate

[Sid-Knee]

Wouldn't matter. Espinoza proved Sky got UK TV and Hearn didn't dispute that the screen shot was legitimate

It very much does matter.

Which media was it? And why would they need to see the "Private" conditions? For what purpose? If Media are shown "Private" conditions, then they're not private are they?

[WBC WBA IBF]

It very much does matter.

Which media was it? And why would they need to see the "Private" conditions? For what purpose? If Media are shown "Private" conditions, then they're not private are they?

Wouldn't matter. Espinoza proved Sky got UK TV and Hearn didn't dispute that the screen shot was legitimate.

[Sid-Knee]

Wouldn't matter. Espinoza proved Sky got UK TV and Hearn didn't dispute that the screen shot was legitimate.

You can't answer because you're talking nonsense.

Anyone can put up a few words claiming Sky get rights. I can do so now. That in itself doesn't prove i have a contract or anything of the sort.

[WBC WBA IBF]

Anyone can put up a few words claiming Sky get rights. I can do so now. That in itself doesn't prove i have a contract or anything of the sort.

It was a screen shot from a contract and Hearn didn't deny it was real. Instead he back pedaled and changed the subject, because he was busted. It's confirmed he was lying. Sky would have gotten UK rights.

[Sid-Knee]

It was a screen shot from a contract and Hearn didn't deny it was real. Instead he back pedaled and changed the subject, because he was busted. It's confirmed he was lying. Sky would have gotten UK rights.

Show me where Hearn Back-peddled and changed the subject? The subject was to show everything and Espinoza refused.

What do you think of the latest Wilder madness? And what do you think of the support from Showtime to such a deranged creature as he? You know, the "Professional" company that supposedly has ethics like you tried to argue?

[WBC WBA IBF]

Show me where Hearn Back-peddled and changed the subject? The subject was to show everything and Espinoza refused

Espinoza posted an excerpt, which if genuine, would prove Hearn lied about BT getting UK rights.

Did Hearn deny the screen shot was real? No. Did he address the screen shot at all? No. Instead he changed the subject and said:

"Show the contract you sent"

But Espinoza never said he sent a contract. Hearn's response was just a distraction. If the screen shot was fake, Hearn would have said it was fake. But he didn't. Instead, he changed the subject, because he knew he was busted.

[Sid-Knee]

Espinoza posted an excerpt, which if genuine, would prove Hearn lied about BT getting UK rights.

Did Hearn deny the screen shot was real? No. Did he address the screen shot at all? No. Instead he changed the subject and said:

"Show the contract you sent"

But Espinoza never said he sent a contract. Hearn's response was just a distraction. If the screen shot was fake, Hearn would have said it was fake. But he didn't. Instead, he changed the subject, because he knew he was busted.

I asked you to show me where Eddie changed the subject like you claimed.

Now it's "If genuine" Haha.

Eddie was asking for the supposed 4 page "Contract" that Espinoza sent over. Espinoza refused. But you've made every excuse in the book, deflected, and refused to back up your claims repeatedly now. This is how Eddie and AJ felt when dealing with fakes who clearly wanted nothing to do with the fight.

Are you not going to answer to Wilder's latest comments and how Showtime according to you, have "Ethics" with their continuous support for the freak?

[WBC WBA IBF]

I asked you to show me where Eddie changed the subject like you claimed.

He changed the subject by not addressing the screen shot and instead saying "show the contract you sent," even though nobody ever said Espinoza sent a contract.

[MulaKO]

Wbcaf cat still sucking cogh ?
You guys still wasting your time with numbnuts
He’s a paid kunt
Fugh him and his loose kunt
He always gonna ride digh , that’s his fughin job