Comments Thread For: Devin Haney: F--- Them, Email Champ is The Top Dog Now!

[LAchargers373]

Stop letting hookers fart in your face pinkeye. Also please stop schilling for matchroom boxing eddies nuts look terrible on ur chin

[The Big Dunn]

I find Haney boring, but I agree that you can't hold the email belt issue against Haney. He could've waited, but he didn't have to.

That said, Loma fighting Teo was not a "cowardly decision" because Lopez was seen as the more dangerous fighter.

Fine. No issue.

Dropping the belt was what I was talking about, not fighting Teo.

Haney is in no way an easy fight which is why he dropped the belt- because a loss took away the Teo fight.

I don’t think it right to hold a business decision against Haney.

[The Big Dunn]

I don't hold it against Haney, it's no fault of his own. But the fact of the matter is he didn't win the belt, therefore he's not a legit champion. It's not fair, but such is life.

You have to win a championship be a legit champion. Simple as that really.

How can you win a title if the champion refuses to fight you so you can win the belt?

Saying Haney wasn’t legit absolutely is holding Loma’s decision against Haney.

[greeneye99]

FFB1A3B2-154D-493E-8089-D63F718E5AAD.jpeg

There you go pinkeye. Some people (like you) don’t know **** about boxing. RIP roger mayweather

I guess You and your Conspiracy theories know everything about Boxing when your fav fighter loses that means the Judges were paid off
Lololololol

[IronDanHamza]

How can you win a title if the champion refuses to fight you so you can win the belt?

Saying Haney wasn’t legit absolutely is holding Loma’s decision against Haney.

You can’t. Like I say, life’s not fair.

Golovkin had the same problem for years, he wasn’t a legit champion either.

If you don’t win the belt, you aren’t a legit champion. Who’s at fault for that is irrelevant.

Haney wasn’t at fault, it doesn’t matter, he didn’t win a title until last weekend.

[ShoulderRoll]

You can’t. Like I say, life’s not fair.

Golovkin had the same problem for years, he wasn’t a legit champion either.

If you don’t win the belt, you aren’t a legit champion. Who’s at fault for that is irrelevant.

Haney wasn’t at fault, it doesn’t matter, he didn’t win a title until last weekend.

If a fighter blatantly ducks a tough opponent do you question the legitimacy of his championship as well?

[LAchargers373]

I guess You and your Conspiracy theories know everything about Boxing when your fav fighter loses that means the Judges were paid off
Lololololol

Huh? I’ve never said that ever lol. I’m confused? You went at me asking for evidence I called bivol by decision. There’s no conspiracy. Bivol >canelo. He always has been. What are u going on about? You mad cause you literally don’t know anything about boxing lol. You work for matchroom boxing but don’t get paid lmao. Not sure why ur on this thread? Haney is top rank fighter now. As soon as he left ur garbage promotion he got the fight he wanted for YEARS. Pink eye and Eddie Hearn (probably the same person) grounded his career same as they did to andrade.

[IronDanHamza]

If a fighter blatantly ducks a tough opponent do you question the legitimacy of his championship as well?

I'd question their decision at that moment as a fighter, not the legitimacy of the title they won in the ring, but it happens in Boxing and always had, Ray Robinson ducked Cocoa Kid and Charley Burley, Mayweather ducked Stevie Johnston, two of the greatest fighters that ever lived. Part and parcel of this boxing thing.

It doesn't get much simpler really, you win a championship; Key word being "win", by winning it in the ring, not by being given it. Regardless of whatever the reason is you were given it. If you're given a title, you're not a legitimate champion. Simple. Haney wasn't the first, won't be the last.

[LAchargers373]

If a fighter blatantly ducks a tough opponent do you question the legitimacy of his championship as well?

There was no ducking. Loma was unifying the division. Haney just had to wait. Like kambosos did. If Haney had waited he would’ve got the fight against Teo before kambumsauce. There also wouldn’t have been a rematch clause because he would’ve been the WBC mandatory. Matchroom did not care. Eddie Hearn is the queen of paper belts. He’s made a living off of picking up vacant belts and holding them hostage. It’s how Haney/andrade/ggg/Liam smith /callum smith all were able to call themselves champions without ever fighting a champion. If Haney had waited he wouldve got a MUCH better payday no rematch in Australia clause. He’s a great fighter that’s gonna do well he’s lucky he got out early. If he had stuck around with matchroom his career would’ve gone the andrade route. Now we’ll see haney vs Stevenson/loma/Teo/taylor/prograis at the very least. Top rank works with everyone so probably tank and rygar at some point too. No conspiracy here pinkeye all facts lil buddy

[joseph5620]

Yeah it does Dan. Haney was a legit mando that got screwed out of a fair title shot. Loma gave him the belt. How anyone holds that against Haney makes no sense to me.

Not in this case. I can see your point if Loma had a medical or uncontrollable issue that forced him to do that.

If Loma gave him the belt because he was going to get surgery or go fight the war- I’d 100% agree with you.

But when you’re the mando and the champ gives you the belt to avoid a defense, I can’t hold that against the challenger given the belt.

Feels like Loma’s cowardly decision is being held against Haney. Not right in my book.

Definitely. Some will even try to switch the narrative as if Haney ducked Lomachenko.