Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comparison of May, Pac and Nelo

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by hugh grant View Post

    I think your pedestalising mediocrity. Floyd s wins over a former flyweight and draining and bloating jmm and nel o respectively makes Floyd better? Floyd s better than Douglas for sure, but so is nelo
    Your downplaying what nel o has did since his loss to floyd and what Pac did his entire career also. Oh no, not this fanboy propaganda again there is nothing nel o can do to be greater than floyd BS, as floyd s win just looks better? Floyd and nel o are neck and neck both won titles 20lbs above there original starting weight.

    You can't admit all Floyd achieved was beat them on night according to judges. Nothing more nothing less. Doesn't mean Floyd is greater. Doesn't mean Floyd would win rematch. Doesn't mean Floyd wouldnt lose 9 out of 10 times with the 2 of them. H2H winner isn't historically greater.
    So Pac and Canelo are great fighters but Floyd EASILY beating both, plus a host of other great fighter and retiring undefeated isn’t? Dumb, even for a complete moron like you.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by just the facts View Post
      So Pac and Canelo are great fighters but Floyd EASILY beating both, plus a host of other great fighter and retiring undefeated isn’t? Dumb, even for a complete moron like you.
      But Floyd didn't beat them in their primes, and yes Floyd wasnt in prime also. And that then just leaves an asterix leaving people wondering I wonder what if, and letting people's imaginations wonder, imagining Pac destroying Floyd if they fought 6 years earlier or in philipines. And Floyd beating Pac at a weight that's closer to Floyd s best weight furtherb diminishes win. I mean is hagler beating duran ATG win? Would Ggg beating floyd at 160 leave people in awe? Timothy Bradley beating Pac isn't a ATG win then why is floyds?
      Last edited by hugh grant; 06-01-2022, 06:57 PM.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by just the facts View Post

        Some historians? Lol, every historian.
        You used to pretend your voice of reason but your actually a raving Floyd fanatic. Your true colours are showing now. It's good your being your authentic self now

        Comment


        • Originally posted by just the facts View Post

          Hell, I don’t know. Who’d he beat? Pac? Canelo? JMM?
          well... he retired undefeated right?

          Comment


          • Originally posted by hugh grant View Post

            But Floyd didn't beat them in their primes, and yes Floyd wasnt in prime also. And that then just leaves an asterix leaving people wondering I wonder what if, and letting people's imaginations wonder, imagining Pac destroying Floyd if they fought 6 years earlier or in philipines. And Floyd beating Pac at a weight that's closer to Floyd s best weight furtherb diminishes win. I mean is hagler beating duran ATG win? Would Ggg beating floyd at 160 leave people in awe? Ingref Bradley beating Pac isn't a ATG win then why is floyds?
            Nope. Floyd was prime. Floyd's true prime was 2009-2015. He was more technical, defensively responsible, smarter and ring general than his younger version. 2013 Floyd would beat his all versions.

            That's another truth that Floyd fans try to hide.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Silence View Post

              Nope. Floyd was prime. Floyd's true prime was 2009-2015. He was more technical, defensively responsible, smarter and ring general than his younger version. 2013 Floyd would beat his all versions.

              That's another truth that Floyd fans try to hide.
              Your so true but I was just trying to show just the facts that I'm being fair and kind and unbiased here. But in previous posts I have said I don't know what version of Floyd beats the Floyd who beat nelo

              Comment


              • Originally posted by hugh grant View Post

                But Floyd didn't beat them in their primes, and yes Floyd wasnt in prime also. And that then just leaves an asterix leaving people wondering I wonder what if, and letting people's imaginations wonder, imagining Pac destroying Floyd if they fought 6 years earlier or in philipines. And Floyd beating Pac at a weight that's closer to Floyd s best weight furtherb diminishes win. I mean is hagler beating duran ATG win? Would Ggg beating floyd at 160 leave people in awe? Ingref Bradley beating Pac isn't a ATG win then why is floyds?
                The world doesn’t revolve around asterisks, it relies on facts. Here are the facts, Floyd easily beat Pac, JMM, Canelo, and a large contingent of other quality fighters and retired undefeated. Therefore, history will forever recognize Floyd as the superior fighter to both (unless Canelo can make some serious strides with what’s left of his career).

                Comment


                • Originally posted by hugh grant View Post

                  You used to pretend your voice of reason but your actually a raving Floyd fanatic. Your true colours are showing now. It's good your being your authentic self now
                  Jokes on you, I’m actually not a huge Floyd fan (he’s not even in my top 10 all time). But I’m not a denyer either. Floyd’s the superior fighter over both Pac and Canelo.

                  You on the other hand can’t seem to wrap your pea sized brain around facts. You continually post dumb shyte like “Pac arguably beat Floyd” when the whole world know that’s just not true.

                  You’re obsessed with Floyd Mayweather. Nearly every post you make on here is about him. Even in threads that have nothing to do with him.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by IceTrayDaGang View Post

                    well... he retired undefeated right?
                    And beat who?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Silence View Post

                      Nope. Floyd was prime. Floyd's true prime was 2009-2015. He was more technical, defensively responsible, smarter and ring general than his younger version. 2013 Floyd would beat his all versions.

                      That's another truth that Floyd fans try to hide.
                      Why would Floyd fans try to hide that?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP