Echols was a very good fighter in the mid to late 90s,robert allen was also a pretty good fighter,it is not Bernards fault that the division at the time lacked superstar talent.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bernard Hopkins - Legendary or Overratted
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by djtmal View Posthow many times did he defend against robert allen and echols about 25 altogther...i thought he beat them to unify the titles as well...
Robert allen - first fight was a NC (mills lane incident), fight had to be rescheduled.
Robert Allen II - Hopkins knocks Allen out in 7 rounds.
Robert Allen III - 5 YEARS LATER Robert Allen worked his way back up to the #1 contender position, making himself hopkins mandatory. Hopkins protested the fight, didn't want it, but would have been stripped of his belt if he refused to fight. Hopkins wins a lopsided victory.
He fought Echols twice and I don't know why you're complaining those were fun fights.
Hopkins did what he had to do with boxings dirty politics. Hopkins was his own promoter and made a lot of enemies in the sport as a result of him not taking **** from the higher ups, promoters, etc. It took hopkins a long time to land big name fights.
So what was hopkins to do, other than cleaning out the division, unifying the belts, fighting his mandatories, and beating the guys put in front of him?
In today's world, everyone complains that there are too many belt holders, and guys duck eachother in their own division. Everyone wants a unified champ. Well, hopkins did that, he had 5-6 belts in fact (only person in history to do so). What more can a man do to earn respect?
Now I ask you the same question, which you've ducked before, name 3-4 active fighters with a better resume than b-hop.Last edited by ИATAS; 09-18-2009, 11:11 AM.
Comment
Comment