a little bit of both.. if he would of fought people his own size and actually bigger opponents, then he would be greater. the only thing Bernard Hopkins is king of though is making people move up to fight him.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bernard Hopkins - Legendary or Overratted
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Benncollinsaad View PostYes. But that does not make you a legend. Not just accomplishing that. You gotta do more than just avoid getting hit to impress. Or so I have understood it anyway...
Erik Morales, Julio Cesar Chavez, Roy Jones, James Toney...none of them just looked to get by with a dull points win. And avoid getting hit. They took in a stiff punch now and then to be able to put an impressive performance and be exciting. They took the risk! Hopkins and Whitaker almost never did.
But then again, you're too dumb to get the point I was trying to make.
....sigh....
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Benncollinsaad View PostGo **** in your hat.Hopkins and Whitaker are no legends, they just know how to avoid getting hit too much. I never respected nor will I respect guys who just play defence and counterpunch all night. All the greatest fighters never did just that.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Benncollinsaad View PostYes. But that does not make you a legend. Not just accomplishing that. You gotta do more than just avoid getting hit to impress. Or so I have understood it anyway...
Erik Morales, Julio Cesar Chavez, Roy Jones, James Toney...none of them just looked to get by with a dull points win. And avoid getting hit. They took in a stiff punch now and then to be able to put an impressive performance and be exciting. They took the risk! Hopkins and Whitaker almost never did.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Benncollinsaad View PostSays who? Can!His only really impressive win as a MW champion was the one over Glen Johnson. I mean, the only time he beat a truly good fighter in an impressive way to defend his title. And Johnson was not as good at MW as he is at LHW.
Comment
Comment