Mayweather would have NEVER taken such a risk

[VG_Addict]

Whatever helps you sleep. Floyd is a low to no risk fighter.

How many all time greats in their prime has he easily beaten

How many has Pacquiao beaten? Unless you want to claim weight-drained Cotto and Thurman coming off a long layoff are ATGs.

[djtmal]

And what the hell is a risk factor??? Lmao how are you inventing new analytical formulas in your head and asking other people to disprove it?

You can figure it out.

How much of a risk was it to fight all the shopworn fighters Floyd fought. I say it was 30% or lower.

You can best believe thats how Floyd cherrypicks his next opponent.

[djtmal]

How many has Pacquiao beaten? Unless you want to claim weight-drained Cotto and Thurman coming off a long layoff are ATGs.

Don't answer my question with a question.

How many prime all time greats has Floyd really beat, since you wanted to go on and on about him easily beating a shopworn fighter.

[Comanche]

You can figure it out.

How much of a risk was it to fight all the shopworn fighters Floyd fought. I say it was 30% or lower.

You can best believe thats how Floyd cherrypicks his next opponent.

Not for me to figure out a formula that only exists in your head.

How were the fighters I named all slow, come forward plodders?

Do you watch boxing? Explain it.

[Gary Coleman]

Floyd still the king all these years later. They just can't let it go.

[djtmal]

Not for me to figure out a formula

How were the fighters I named all slow, come forward plodders?

Do you watch boxing? Explain it.

They were all shopworn versions of themselves thats why thats all they could do.

Now stop making excuses and answer the question.

What risk percentage was it for Floyd to fight said shopworn fighters that you obviously hold in such high regard. I say 30% or lower

[VG_Addict]

Don't answer my question with a question.

How many prime all time greats has Floyd really beat, since you wanted to go on and on about him easily beating a shopworn fighter.

Given how their fight went, there's no reason to think any version of Pacquiao beats Floyd. Pacquiao has always had obvious, glaring technical flaws, he was just able to cover them with his athleticism.

Marquez, who is NOWHERE NEAR the counter-puncher Floyd is, gave Pacquiao fits in all of their fights. What did people think Floyd, one of the best counter-punchers of all time, was going to do?

[djtmal]

Given how their fight went, there's no reason to think any version of Pacquiao beats Floyd. Pacquiao has always had obvious, glaring technical flaws, he was just able to cover them with his athleticism.

Marquez, who is NOWHERE NEAR the counter-puncher Floyd is, gave Pacquiao fits in all of their fights. What did people think Floyd, one of the best counter-punchers of all time, was going to do?

Answer the question direct please. How many prime all time great fighters did Floyd beat

[Gary Coleman]

Answer the question direct please. How many prime all time great fighters did Floyd beat

What a weird question. How many all time great fighters were in Floyd's era for him to fight that he avoided?

[hugh grant]

How many has Pacquiao beaten? Unless you want to claim weight-drained Cotto and Thurman coming off a long layoff are ATGs.

Well, to be fair Pac has beat Barrera and JMM who were in their prime and theyre ATGs id say. So Pac has beat 2 at the very least. Plus when Pac is beating solid genuine WWs 7 divisions north of where he started out they dont need to be ATGs for them to be phenomenal wins. Cotto and Thurman were in prime and historically solid no joke WWs. Thats better SRL beating hagler.