Mayweather would have NEVER taken such a risk
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Now you’re copying other posters criticisms of you.
Yes, I see the fans defending him. But I also see you’re the only one on full damage control. As if it’s a job. You’re a grown man defending a man who doesn’t even know you exist. Now that’s corny. AND pathetic.And I’m not mad at Canelo losing. Look at my post history if you’d like. I picked Bivol to beat Nelo. I just applauded him for the risk.
Lmfao. Anything but just admitting your thread premise is wrong.
Of course you’re upset canelo lost. Why else would you make a Floyd thread so close to Canelo losing?
If you actually picked Bivol we’d expect to see a thread congratulating him. Didn’t see that from you.
You can easily applaud the risk without mentioning any other boxer other than the 2 involved.
No what is pathetic and corny is making a Floyd hate thread after we had a major upset that energized the sport instead of a thread about that fight. Then getting mad when your premise and facts are corrected.
How was Floyd even on your mind???Last edited by The Big Dunn; 05-19-2022, 07:01 AM.Comment
-
I find it funny how people go on about how Khan's height and reach would have troubled Floyd, as if Khan is Thomas Hearns, when Khan is 1-2 inches taller than Floyd AT MOST, and Floyd actually has the longer reach.
Garcia, Canelo and Crawford figured Khan out, but Floyd wouldn't be able to because reasons.
Khan would never beat Floyd. I don't give a **** what boxers and trainers say. The reality is that boxers and trainers aren't THAT much better at predicting who will win a fight than boxing fans.Last edited by VG_Addict; 05-19-2022, 07:16 AM.Comment
-
I bet it's all the floyd fans telling Nelo who he should fight next. Beterbiev, charlo, andrade, etc.
Ali is respected as he took on all comers. Floyd doesnt. Floyd fans think just because floyd has some nice names in his resume that is the same as Ali did?
Floyd avoided best fighters in his own division i e thurman, spence, brook, bradley etc etc, so surely doesn't qualify for taking on all comersComment
-
Khan was too much of a riskI find it funny how people go on about how Khan's height and reach would have troubled Floyd, as if Khan is Thomas Hearns, when Khan is 1-2 inches taller than Floyd AT MOST, and Floyd actually has the longer reach.
Garcia, Canelo and Crawford figured Khan out, but Floyd wouldn't be able to because reasons.
Khan would never beat Floyd. I don't give a **** what boxers and trainers say. The reality is that boxers and trainers aren't THAT much better at predicting who will win a fight than boxing fans.Comment
-
Floyd has to control the whole narrative they have to be short, slow, short armed, come forward. They have to agree to his hundreds of demands or no fight.
I bet it's all the floyd fans telling Nelo who he should fight next. Beterbiev, charlo, andrade, etc.
Ali is respected as he took on all comers. Floyd doesnt. Floyd fans think just because floyd has some nice names in his resume that is the same as Ali did?
Floyd avoided best fighters in his own division i e thurman, spence, brook, bradley etc etc, so surely doesn't qualify for taking on all comers
With all that obvious cherrypicking you have Floyd Boys still trying to say he was a risk takerComment
-
Who are these fast, tall, rangy boxers Floyd didn't fight, besides Khan?
Floyd had long arms for a WW, and was one of the fastest fighters ever. Why does Floyd get criticized for having physical advantages over opponents, and using them? If you had physical advantages over an opponent, why would you NOT use them?
Meanwhile, nobody criticizes Thomas Hearns for having a height and reach advantage over everyone he fought.Last edited by VG_Addict; 05-19-2022, 10:51 AM.Comment
-
Hearn is criticised by peoples actions. He isnt isnt seen as good as Duran and SRl as he had the advantages. Floyd had to show how good he was by disadvantaging himself but he didnt like to.Who are these fast, tall, rangy boxers Floyd didn't fight, besides Khan?
Floyd had long arms for a WW, and was one of the fastest fighters ever. Why does Floyd get criticized for having physical advantages over opponents, and using them? If you had physical advantages over an opponent, why would you NOT use them?
Meanwhile, nobody criticizes Thomas Hearns for having a height and reach advantage over everyone he fought.Comment
Comment