Comments Thread For: Anthony Joshua Believes He Could Lure Tyson Fury Out of Retirement

[LAchargers373]

AJ loses again fury fight will never happen. Even if he wins he will fight a 3rd with usyk hearn won’t let fury destroy his meal ticket.

[Rockybigblower]

Fury has 2 options at the moment. Fight AJ/Usyk winner...or hand in the WBC belt. If he hands it in...two bums might fight for it. Then AJ could....if he beats Usyk....fight the winning bum and become undisputed..thus giving him bragging rights over Fury for life. Fury needs to become undisputed before AJ ...if he loses...or through AJ if he wins. It's the only way he sleeps at night.

[sicko]

I doubt you get past Usyk personally AJ but Good Luck To You!

[Nash out]

Joshua needs to revert back to being Femi. Femi is unbeaten. Femi beat Whyte and Wlad. Joshua lost to Ruiz and Usyk. Okay, Joshua beat Ruiz 2 and Pulev, but he is better as Femi, and it would be another remarkable win for Tyson Fury when he takes Femi's 0. Nash out. AKA, Dr. Boxing.

[vitali1999]

AJ is a has been

[Oregonian]

Joshua needs to revert back to being Femi. Femi is unbeaten. Femi beat Whyte and Wlad. Joshua lost to Ruiz and Usyk. Okay, Joshua beat Ruiz 2 and Pulev, but he is better as Femi, and it would be another remarkable win for Tyson Fury when he takes Femi's 0. Nash out. AKA, Dr. Boxing.

————
Who the hell is Femi? You f you’re referring to AJ’s 2nd persona then perhaps Khan’s other persons can claim a rematch with Canelo and Crawford. He probably beats them both

[Toffee]

AJ is a has been

Phrases like this seem to get thrown around about Joshua on here.

He's about to fight for 3 versions of the world championship. Belts that he unified and lost to an outstanding fighter in their last fight.

That's not a 'has been'. That's someone entirely relevant to the heavyweight scene.

[REDEEMER]

Imagine Michael Moorer circa 1999 thinking Lennox Lewis must fight him to secure his legacy. Joshua is the mouse that roared. The #4 HW of his era with a “legacy” built on beating a 40 year old Fury had soundly outpointed. That’s his defining win. And he keeps losing his belt. If it weren’t for outmoded 1940s Nationalism, he’d be Tim Witherspoon with less boxing ability

Imagine if A.Js only two title defenses were Vaughn Bean and Francois Botha thinking Fury had to fight him to secure his legacy ?

Unfortunately for you guys he’s a multi defending unified champion and has the better record out of the entire division should he defeat Usyk . Lewis would not have went near Usyk anyway ,he didn’t even dare touch a few southpaws in his own era let alone a Usyk so maybe A.J also shows up Lewis at the same time ?

If A.J actually has to lure Fury to fight him again it says more about Furys continuing circus show of pulling teeth to try and get him to volunteer to fight the better fighters without some problems and demands .

[vitali1999]

Phrases like this seem to get thrown around about Joshua on here.

He's about to fight for 3 versions of the world championship. Belts that he unified and lost to an outstanding fighter in their last fight.

That's not a 'has been'. That's someone entirely relevant to the heavyweight scene.

Only because of rematch clauses. Knocked around the ring like a rag doll against a short, fat little Mexican and dominated by a Light Heavyweight is no relevant Heavyweight. Fury is best British fighter.

[Toffee]

Only because of rematch clauses. Knocked around the ring like a rag doll against a short, fat little Mexican and dominated by a Light Heavyweight is no relevant Heavyweight. Fury is best British fighter.

I gave you facts.

You have a dislike of Joshua, fair enough. But the fact is he's very relevant. Because he's the former unified titlist about to fight the current unified titlist.

How much more relevant do you want a guy to be?