Comments Thread For: Amir Khan Feels His Entire Legacy is Being Staked in Brook Grudge Fight

[Slip jab]

I think khans legacy is likely being stopped and of course refusing to be a stepping stone for brook considering each guys respective form at the time Kell won the ibf strap. In a sense this is the legacy.
I think Benn gets the winner

[KillaMane26]

No it isn't... The things Khan been saying just been confirming what people already thought

He didn't fight Brook cause he did not want to risk losing to his UK rival. Literally rather have his head caved in fighting the likes of Canelo.

But regardless one fight doesn't define a guy career, Khan gets hate but he was a good pro and good amateur. Nobody can' take that away from him

[SplitSecond]

It’s really not that big a deal guys. You lose some you win some. Just give it maximum effort.

That said I feel this win would be bigger for Brook than Khan. Not sure why, but that’s the impression I get and it’s possibly because Brook didn’t achieve much of anything.

[Tatabanya]

Well... at least Khan can brag about his win with Maidana. Someone like Adrien Broner can't even do that.

[Monty Fisto]

Khan your legacy is safe. Your legacy was secured when u fought Briedis Prescott, Danny Garcia, Canelo, and Crawford. These are fights where u were vaporized, spun 360° by a left hook, knocked into a perma dream, and quit on your feet like a dog, from a damned so-called thigh shot which was really a clean shot. Also the numerous other times u were buckled, stunned, hurt.and dropped, by lower caliber fighters. So ur legacy is secure for the next 1,000 years

You show your bias when you say it was a clean shot against Crawford. You can say Khan was outclassed in that fight, that he quit in that fight and it would all be fair comment. You say he quit after a clean shot, and you are talking plain shlt. Crawford hit him with a dirty shot in a fight he was easily winning. It gave Khan an out. You can criticise Khan all you want for taking the out, but you cannot claim it was a clean shot. Anyone with eyes can see it was clearly low, which is against the rules and dirty as hell.

[thack]

It’s really not that big a deal guys. You lose some you win some. Just give it maximum effort.

That said I feel this win would be bigger for Brook than Khan. Not sure why, but that’s the impression I get and it’s possibly because Brook didn’t achieve much of anything.

Lol.....Brook went over to America and beat the then unbeaten titlist Shawn Porter who was prime...Khan went to America and got destroyed .fm you causals

[SplitSecond]

Lol.....Brook went over to America and beat the then unbeaten titlist Shawn Porter who was prime...Khan went to America and got destroyed .fm you causals

Beating Porter isn’t special. Julio Diaz could have a win over Porter. Khan beat better fighters more consistently. Great, Brook beat Porter, anything not a bum outside of that one guy have stopped him though. He has no legacy. Fgt.

[shahida TKO]

khan fought 14 world champions and former champions in his career..

[The Old LefHook]

I am not sorry to inform him that he has no legacy.

[archiemoore1]

You show your bias when you say it was a clean shot against Crawford. You can say Khan was outclassed in that fight, that he quit in that fight and it would all be fair comment. You say he quit after a clean shot, and you are talking plain shlt. Crawford hit him with a dirty shot in a fight he was easily winning. It gave Khan an out. You can criticise Khan all you want for taking the out, but you cannot claim it was a clean shot. Anyone with eyes can see it was clearly low, which is against the rules and dirty as hell.

Crawford is a clean fighter. And now that Amir just got knocked the f..k out by Kell Brook, am I still biased, or do u cuckolds now see why Amir Khan ran like a dog from Kell Brook for over a decade??!