POLL: Size Difference: Mayweather-Marquez vs. Cotto-Pacquiao

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • THE REED
    Sixty Forty
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2007
    • 43481
    • 1,988
    • 1,483
    • 690,068,075

    #41
    Originally posted by Pullcounter
    yea it does
    No it doesn't

    yea it does
    No it doesn't

    I did
    No, you gave some cryptic answer.

    yes it does
    No it doesn't

    I actually prefer it that way
    I noticed

    I'm neither cryptic nor do i have an hidden agenda except making cotto stans mad
    So you admit you post just for bait

    Comment

    • King Flawless
      Banned
      • Aug 2009
      • 1103
      • 103
      • 10
      • 1,415

      #42
      This thread is hilarious now

      Comment

      • Doctor_Tenma
        Monster
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2009
        • 33313
        • 1,327
        • 1,249
        • 58,127

        #43
        Because Cotto is bigger then all 3 doesn't necessarily mean, the size difference betwen Cotto/ Pacquiao is biggger then Mayweather/ Marquez. Take into account that Pacquiao is also bigger then Marquez. So that doesn't answer his question. Just saying, although I believe the difference between Cotto/ Pacquiao is bigger. Infact, I KNOW.

        Comment

        • THE REED
          Sixty Forty
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Apr 2007
          • 43481
          • 1,988
          • 1,483
          • 690,068,075

          #44
          Originally posted by El Dominicano.
          Because Cotto is bigger then all 3 doesn't necessarily, the size difference betwen Cotto/ Pacquiao is biggger then Mayweather/ Marquez. Take into account that Pacquiao is also bigger then Marquez. So that doesn't answer his question.
          Exactly......

          Comment

          • fighter46
            Amateur
            Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
            • May 2009
            • 12
            • 1
            • 1
            • 6,036

            #45
            Mayweather-Marquez because Marquez has never fought above 135.

            Comment

            • Doctor_Tenma
              Monster
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Apr 2009
              • 33313
              • 1,327
              • 1,249
              • 58,127

              #46
              In Pull's case,

              Notice that unofficial weight is only important when talking about Cotto vs Pacquiao. As we can see from his sig. Sadly, the same doesn't aply to Marquez and Mayweather. Pull is a certified hypocrite.


              I'm sure he'll depict every sentence and provide nothing in the process.

              Comment

              • Pullcounter
                no guts no glory
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jan 2004
                • 42582
                • 549
                • 191
                • 49,739

                #47
                Originally posted by reedickyaluss
                No, you gave some cryptic answer.
                it wasn't that cryptic. the answer to your question was implied.


                So you admit you post just for bait
                yes! sometimes its fun to mess w/ cotto stans!

                Comment

                • Doctor_Tenma
                  Monster
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Apr 2009
                  • 33313
                  • 1,327
                  • 1,249
                  • 58,127

                  #48
                  Originally posted by fighter46
                  Mayweather-Marquez because Marquez has never fought above 135.
                  We're not talking about the weight they faught at.

                  Comment

                  • THE REED
                    Sixty Forty
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Apr 2007
                    • 43481
                    • 1,988
                    • 1,483
                    • 690,068,075

                    #49
                    Originally posted by El Dominicano.
                    In Pull's case,

                    Notice that unofficial weight is only important when talking about Cotto vs Pacquiao. As we can see from his sig. Sadly, the same doesn't aply to Marquez and Mayweather. Pull is a certified hypocrite.


                    I'm sure he'll depict every sentence and provide nothing in the process.

                    Comment

                    • Pullcounter
                      no guts no glory
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jan 2004
                      • 42582
                      • 549
                      • 191
                      • 49,739

                      #50
                      Originally posted by El Dominicano.
                      Because Cotto is bigger then all 3 doesn't necessarily mean, the size difference betwen Cotto/ Pacquiao is biggger then Mayweather/ Marquez.
                      it means exactly that

                      Take into account that Pacquiao is also bigger then Marquez.
                      that doesn't matter because cotto is much bigger than them both.

                      So that doesn't answer his question. Just saying, although I believe the difference between Cotto/ Pacquiao is bigger. Infact, I KNOW.
                      the answer is implied.

                      Originally posted by El Dominicano.
                      In Pull's case,

                      Notice that unofficial weight is only important when talking about Cotto vs Pacquiao.
                      nope, I say pbf is bigger than jmm all the time

                      As we can see from his sig. Sadly, the same doesn't aply to Marquez and Mayweather.
                      false check out the jmm/pbf threads. I always say jmm is too small.

                      Pull is a certified hypocrite.
                      nope

                      I'm sure he'll depict every sentence and provide nothing in the process.

                      false

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP