Comments Thread For: Tyson Fury: Whyte Fight Will Be Easy, I Knock Him Out - Very Easy as Well!

[billeau2]

Fury has no direct power to scare Whyte ,Fury is not Klitschko that’s why he ran from the rematch . Klitschko doesn’t struggle with Wallin either your reaching again .

1. So? According to your logic JFK would beat any man in the ring and world because he had Addison's disease.
2. Your assuming the motives of a man (Fury) of whom it could be said, his motives are always open to speculation.
3. Triangle theory is truly the habitat of the casual... You lose credability using it Stuart. There are many valid reasons why triangle theory is not respected as a tool for analyzing information about a fighter.

[SplitSecond]

It's a good win on his resume. I'm hoping for a raucous atmosphere.

[Stuart Chandler]

1. So? According to your logic JFK would beat any man in the ring and world because he had Addison's disease.
2. Your assuming the motives of a man (Fury) of whom it could be said, his motives are always open to speculation.
3. Triangle theory is truly the habitat of the casual... You lose credability using it Stuart. There are many valid reasons why triangle theory is not respected as a tool for analyzing information about a fighter.

JFK would be fighting Fury next if he were alive if Fury can get away with it instead of Whyte, when Fury gets knocked out you are going to be in a real damage control on here . I do like the attempt of sounding of sounding witty at least I can’t dive fully into you because you actually come up with clever stuff that redirects what the topic is . Steps 2 and 3 will be shown after Fury retires .

[Jack_sh*t]

I’m just passing on what others have said to me on here ,I thought that was the standard . How about 10K do you have 10 K ? People can abuse me but it’s funny guys like you think you can get away with it ,and I’ve already proven you wrong why are you beating a dead horse .

You sound drunk.

Are you drunk?

[Stuart Chandler]

You sound drunk.

Are you drunk?

Well obviously I still wouldn’t be drunk by the time you responded . Are you drunk and don’t know how long since I posted to you afternoon yesterday ?

[Jack_sh*t]

Well obviously I still wouldn’t be drunk by the time you responded . Are you drunk and don’t know how long since I posted to you afternoon yesterday ?

Your attempts at English aren't bad, but you keep getting the words in the wrong order. What's your first language?

[billeau2]

JFK would be fighting Fury next if he were alive if Fury can get away with it instead of Whyte, when Fury gets knocked out you are going to be in a real damage control on here . I do like the attempt of sounding of sounding witty at least I can’t dive fully into you because you actually come up with clever stuff that redirects what the topic is . Steps 2 and 3 will be shown after Fury retires .

I didn't redirect... You made a statement that Fury had fear, I merely pointed out to an absurd degree how a lack of fear manifested in an acute illness, using a public figure who had the disease. the point being that fear is not a prerequisite to failure and... when we have virtually no fear, we are a danger to ourselves. Many people feel Kennedy and the Bay of Pigs almost caused a nuclear calamity. It could have been a contributing factor that Kennedy had a disease (Addison's) that did not give him the empathetic response of "fear."

No... I never state unequivocally that one fighter will win no matter what. I merely give an opinion and explain it. YES, Fury will probably win this fight, I would be very suprised if Whyte found a way to catch him... and BTW I suspect you ALSO would be very suprised if Whyte found a way to catch Fury and end the fight... which he probably needs to do because he aint outboxing Fury. lol. Yes you would be shocked as the rest of us...

[Stuart Chandler]

I didn't redirect... You made a statement that Fury had fear, I merely pointed out to an absurd degree how a lack of fear manifested in an acute illness, using a public figure who had the disease. the point being that fear is not a prerequisite to failure and... when we have virtually no fear, we are a danger to ourselves. Many people feel Kennedy and the Bay of Pigs almost caused a nuclear calamity. It could have been a contributing factor that Kennedy had a disease (Addison's) that did not give him the empathetic response of "fear."

No... I never state unequivocally that one fighter will win no matter what. I merely give an opinion and explain it. YES, Fury will probably win this fight, I would be very suprised if Whyte found a way to catch him... and BTW I suspect you ALSO would be very suprised if Whyte found a way to catch Fury and end the fight... which he probably needs to do because he aint outboxing Fury. lol. Yes you would be shocked as the rest of us...

I accepted a ban bet so why would I be surprised if Whyte won do you really read my lists and facts I show ? Fury would be praised if he knocked out Kennedy and his fans would claim he’s better than Whyte without fighting Whyte and be the greatest of all time .

[Stuart Chandler]

Your attempts at English aren't bad, but you keep getting the words in the wrong order. What's your first language?

So your drunk now and can’t see right ?

[billeau2]

I accepted a ban bet so why would I be surprised if Whyte won do you really read my lists and facts I show ? Fury would be praised if he knocked out Kennedy and his fans would claim he’s better than Whyte without fighting Whyte and be the greatest of all time .

A ban bet with an account that has almost a thousand posts... that is the smell of confidence! Lists and facts? If before the Tyson Douglas fight I had told the world Douglas would win... what "facts" would have shown that to be? What analsysis that others had missed? There was one guy who called it and claimed Tyson never fought a rangy guy with a superb jab, but that was debatable.

What fact have you uncovered that show all the factors align up and show Whyte will prevail? I don't believe there are any... Interesting fact: When Galileo claimed to be able to predict the time and place of Jupiter's moons based on gravity, He was right... sometimes... And his facts were dodgy, so much so that most people, while not necessarily wanting him to be accused of hericy, probably thought him nuts. Even though Galileo was right... even his facts were occasional and his reasonng took a leap of faith. See where I am going with this Stuart?