Comments Thread For: Tyson Fury: Whyte Fight Will Be Easy, I Knock Him Out - Very Easy as Well!

[Jack_sh*t]

So I’m a keyboard warrior for showing you a fact you said I didn’t give of Fury getting dropped ,I mean you got that wrong not me acting all big and bad telling me watch what I say before I know the facts ?

No, you're a keyboard warrior for mouthing off throwing insults around. I mis-remembered Fury v McDermott and you corrected me. I hadn't checked back and that shiz happens as you get older. But you then used that as an excuse to puff up your ego and become insulting.

How many posters have you abused on this thread now? You seem less like a fan of the sport and more like you're looking for an online fight to compensate for your feelings of inadequacy.

[Stuart Chandler]

No, you're a keyboard warrior for mouthing off throwing insults around. I mis-remembered Fury v McDermott and you corrected me. I hadn't checked back and that shiz happens as you get older. But you then used that as an excuse to puff up your ego and become insulting.

How many posters have you abused on this thread now? You seem less like a fan of the sport and more like you're looking for an online fight to compensate for your feelings of inadequacy.

I got 100 K says I can beat you up see who the big mouth is calling someone a keyboard warrior is an invite to a fight which you did ?

[Jack_sh*t]

I got 100 K says I can beat you up see who the big mouth is calling someone a keyboard warrior is an invite to a fight which you did ?

Can I just say how much I admire your emotional maturity?

That you Charlie Z?

PMSL.

[billeau2]

I love it when Fury speaks in an interview and folks think that he means anything he says and then get worked up. He is a total wack job artist and a super weirdo and I don’t even know if there is a method to his madness. It just could be plain old madness. Love it.

Fury gives indications. He really does if you watch him. I mean I couldn't tell you from an analytical point of view, not off the top of my head, how he indicates such things but its pretty obvious to me when he is bustin' blls. Not saying that this makes him ethically whole, but it does make it silly when people can't see the differences in Fury's schtict.

[billeau2]

what a lot of people seem to be responding to are the levels of the game... Whyte isn't bad for a heavyweight in this era, but hes not no the level of Fury. Its just that simple. This should be an easy fight for Fury.

[Stuart Chandler]

what a lot of people seem to be responding to are the levels of the game... Whyte isn't bad for a heavyweight in this era, but hes not no the level of Fury. Its just that simple. This should be an easy fight for Fury.

What easy fight has Fury had ? Same as who did Oscar knock out to consider him a killer no one in the history section provided for reference of a Joe Frazier fighting a power puncher and winning .

[Stuart Chandler]

Can I just say how much I admire your emotional maturity?

That you Charlie Z?

PMSL.

I’m just passing on what others have said to me on here ,I thought that was the standard . How about 10K do you have 10 K ? People can abuse me but it’s funny guys like you think you can get away with it ,and I’ve already proven you wrong why are you beating a dead horse .

[Toffee]

I love it when Fury speaks in an interview and folks think that he means anything he says and then get worked up. He is a total wack job artist and a super weirdo and I don’t even know if there is a method to his madness. It just could be plain old madness. Love it.

Just seen him interviewed where he said he's glad that Matchroom didn't pay more for the purse bid... because when they did that for Lopez/Kambosos they couldn't afford to pay their bills.

Er, no. Top Rank tried to cheap out their fighter, Triller bidded big and failed to deliver it, and it was Matchroom who eventually got the show on.

Full of schitt doesn't begin to explain Fury. He can fight, but he's full of schitt.

And the IFL interviewer just nods along and says 'yes'.

I think it's fair to say that Hearn has a point that the Fury interviews are staged or on conditions. No-one calls him out. Maybe they're not allowed to?

[billeau2]

What easy fight has Fury had ? Same as who did Oscar knock out to consider him a killer no one in the history section provided for reference of a Joe Frazier fighting a power puncher and winning .

Your post is all over the place. The last statement about Frazier can be answered. You got a lot of answers. Look back at the thread... What are you asking about Fury? Oscar who?

Heres game Stuart: Once you lose the dichotomy of "winning/losing" something that could be in the control of judges, a lucky punch, etc... there are ways to look at the skills a fighter has. Whyte, to me, is to be admired... I always had incredible respect for Whyte. He came into boxing late, and from another sport... both conditions that seldom favor success, and has worked this weak era to a major advantage of his. He has done a Tex Cobb and then some! So I always have to remind people here that I have been in Whyte's corner forever. Ortiz and Whyte were being championed by me when everyone was calling them all kinds of unmentionables!

With that said, there is no way a late comer, with limited technical savy will compare in skill sets to a guy who has been boxing since being a kid. Fury is old school that way, he depends on his skills and he listens to people who train him. The guy has more templates than microsoft! He can sit down on his punches and Kayo, box your ears off, etc. THERE IS NO COMPARISON.

Ill prove it to you: Can you picture Whyte beating the Klitsko Fury fought? the answer may be YES... Can you picture Whyte using timing and feinting, footwork, to basically flumox an experienced champion into hardly throwing a punch? the answer is NO.

Fury is capable of boxing Whyte's small ears off, Knocking him out, and even physically beating him ugly. Whyte relies on his punch... thats all he has. So again: could he beat Fury with a good punch? YES. But Whyte has to be perfect and lucky.

[Stuart Chandler]

Your post is all over the place. The last statement about Frazier can be answered. You got a lot of answers. Look back at the thread... What are you asking about Fury? Oscar who?

Heres game Stuart: Once you lose the dichotomy of "winning/losing" something that could be in the control of judges, a lucky punch, etc... there are ways to look at the skills a fighter has. Whyte, to me, is to be admired... I always had incredible respect for Whyte. He came into boxing late, and from another sport... both conditions that seldom favor success, and has worked this weak era to a major advantage of his. He has done a Tex Cobb and then some! So I always have to remind people here that I have been in Whyte's corner forever. Ortiz and Whyte were being championed by me when everyone was calling them all kinds of unmentionables!

With that said, there is no way a late comer, with limited technical savy will compare in skill sets to a guy who has been boxing since being a kid. Fury is old school that way, he depends on his skills and he listens to people who train him. The guy has more templates than microsoft! He can sit down on his punches and Kayo, box your ears off, etc. THERE IS NO COMPARISON.

Ill prove it to you: Can you picture Whyte beating the Klitsko Fury fought? the answer may be YES... Can you picture Whyte using timing and feinting, footwork, to basically flumox an experienced champion into hardly throwing a punch? the answer is NO.

Fury is capable of boxing Whyte's small ears off, Knocking him out, and even physically beating him ugly. Whyte relies on his punch... thats all he has. So again: could he beat Fury with a good punch? YES. But Whyte has to be perfect and lucky.

Fury has no direct power to scare Whyte ,Fury is not Klitschko that’s why he ran from the rematch . Klitschko doesn’t struggle with Wallin either your reaching again .