Brick Top reminding Eddie Hills who the boss is.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Stuart Chandler
    Banned
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Mar 2020
    • 931
    • 162
    • 191
    • 1,796

    #81
    Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT

    Fury needs Whyte?

    Sweet Caroline…
    Fury wouldn’t be allowed by Top Rank to do a stadium event unless he can get them a profit ,we know he can’t without Whyte .

    Comment

    • RJJ-94-02=GOAT
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2017
      • 28929
      • 9,235
      • 2,042
      • 246,831

      #82
      Originally posted by Stuart Chandler

      Fury wouldn’t be allowed by Top Rank to do a stadium event unless he can get them a profit ,we know he can’t without Whyte .
      You really think Fury needs Whyte?

      Stop trolling kid…

      Comment

      • RJJ-94-02=GOAT
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2017
        • 28929
        • 9,235
        • 2,042
        • 246,831

        #83
        Originally posted by KP1


        https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/10000...n-tickets/amp/

        https://lvsportsbiz.com/2019/06/21/f...187-comps/amp/


        https://bigfightweekend.com/news/fur...ffice-failure/


        Yeah these were just rip roaring successes, this is a complete gamble at that price that the UK grudge match angle sells, even Hearns bid was possibly pushing it.

        There is nothing in Furys history that suggest sticking his name on any fight generates that sort of cash.

        It’s clear from the 41m they bid that they certainly value Whyte at more than 20%.








        The first link is the Sun…

        I think that says it all.

        A reliable source like ESPN on the other hand…

        https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.esp...platform%3Damp

        “hE’s NuTta dRaW”
        Last edited by RJJ-94-02=GOAT; 01-30-2022, 03:47 PM.

        Comment

        • Toffee
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Oct 2018
          • 7384
          • 2,555
          • 75
          • 62,824

          #84
          Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT

          “Would indicate” hypothetical…

          As I said let’s just keep to the facts, no bidders were complied to make side deals with fighters. There’s no evidence of any side deals besides from mere speculation.
          That's not true is it?

          Fury has a contract with Arum/Warren that covers guarantees, fees, revenue shares etc and any other agreements they may make. That's not hypothetical - that's factual.

          His pay will be governed by his contract and any other agreements he makes. That's why the Warren purse bid is only relevant to winning the bid and paying Whyte.

          I'm sure he's doing fine out of the deal. I'm also sure he's not just getting a percentage of the purse bid - it will be a completely separate agreement.
          Last edited by Toffee; 01-30-2022, 04:27 PM.

          Comment

          • RJJ-94-02=GOAT
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2017
            • 28929
            • 9,235
            • 2,042
            • 246,831

            #85
            Originally posted by Toffee

            That's not true is it?

            Fury has a contract with Arum/Warren that covers guarantees, fees, revenue shares etc and any other agreements they may make. That's not hypothetical - that's factual.

            His pay will be governed by his contract and any other agreements he makes. That's why the Warren purse bid is only relevant to winning the bid and paying Whyte.

            I'm sure he's doing fine out of the deal. I'm also sure he's not just getting a percentage of the purse bid - it will be a completely separate agreement.
            It’s completely true.

            No promoter’s we’re complied to make side deals with either fighter.

            Check the rules of the purse bid.

            Comment

            • Toffee
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Oct 2018
              • 7384
              • 2,555
              • 75
              • 62,824

              #86
              Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT

              It’s completely true.

              No promoter’s we’re complied to make side deals with either fighter.

              Check the rules of the purse bid.
              But you agree that Fury has a contract with his promoters?

              Comment

              • RJJ-94-02=GOAT
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2017
                • 28929
                • 9,235
                • 2,042
                • 246,831

                #87
                Originally posted by Toffee

                But you agree that Fury has a contract with his promoters?
                What fighter doesn’t have a contract with their promoter?

                No bidder was complied to make a side deal with either fighter. That’s 100% correct.

                Maybe they did, maybe they didn’t but we won’t likely ever know so I’ve said to WBC, WBA, IBF can we please just stick to the facts.

                Comment

                • Toffee
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Oct 2018
                  • 7384
                  • 2,555
                  • 75
                  • 62,824

                  #88
                  Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT

                  What fighter doesn’t have a contract with their promoter?

                  No bidder was complied to make a side deal with either fighter. That’s 100% correct.

                  Maybe they did, maybe they didn’t but we won’t likely ever know so I’ve said to WBC, WBA, IBF can we please just stick to the facts.
                  And it's a fact that Top Rank/Queensberry's remuneration to Tyson Fury is governed by the contract between them, not by Purse Bids.

                  It's not even a side deal. It's an existing contract.

                  Without seeing details - I'm 100% certain that Fury's pay for this fight will not just be 80% of the purse bid.

                  Comment

                  • Stuart Chandler
                    Banned
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Mar 2020
                    • 931
                    • 162
                    • 191
                    • 1,796

                    #89
                    Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT

                    You really think Fury needs Whyte?

                    Stop trolling kid…


                    You think they would put Fury in stadium without Whyte and blow millions on an empty event ? Whyte gave Fury his highest payday if he doesn’t run away ,he let him be greedy because he’s going to be the new WBC champion anyway .

                    Comment

                    • RJJ-94-02=GOAT
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2017
                      • 28929
                      • 9,235
                      • 2,042
                      • 246,831

                      #90
                      Originally posted by Stuart Chandler

                      You think they would put Fury in stadium without Whyte and blow millions on an empty event ? Whyte gave Fury his highest payday if he doesn’t run away ,he let him be greedy because he’s going to be the new WBC champion anyway .
                      Fury is the far bigger draw than Whyte stop trolling Robbie…

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP